Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5460
Next month in: 00:58:23
Server time: 15:01:36, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Arusu-Weareback | Paulo Nogueira | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Income tax proposal of March 3299

Details

Submitted by[?]: Stanton House

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes to change income taxes. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 3300

Description[?]:

The Stanton Family (tory) propose to adjust the government's income tax policy to better address the economic situation of the Sovereign County of Beluzia.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:23:01, May 05, 2012 CET
From Beluz Democratic Karavist Party
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of March 3299
Message1) You're copying our system, every time we make one. All you do is add/remove brackets randomly.
2) This earns approximately 17,000,000,000 less than the current system. With only a surplus of 6,000,000,000, this would put us into a debt crisis of at least 11,000,000,000.
3) We already told you that you suck at Finance; give up.

Date14:25:35, May 05, 2012 CET
FromPatterson House
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of March 3299
MessageThe DeKarav's should be a little less rude.

Date14:27:00, May 05, 2012 CET
FromPatterson House
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of March 3299
MessageI approve of these measures. We give people a tax cut and compensate for it with a 5% tax hike on corporations.

Date14:33:59, May 05, 2012 CET
From Beluz Democratic Karavist Party
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of March 3299
MessageYou approve of these measures? We cannot just cut their taxes before hiking another tax; we have to hike the other one first. If we cut taxes, we get thrown into debt again. Luckily, the last crisis was less than 105,000,000. This bill will put us into a situation with a debt of 104 times that.

Then we'll lose more jobs, because corporations will close to go to countries with lower rates. More job loss = another economic crisis, which is what forced us to raise taxes recently. Fortunately, the tax hike brought us to be able to spend more, so the people are really getting what they're paying taxes for.

--

OOC: They really do that. There is a set amount of corporations, and they seek to be in the nations with the lowest tax rates and the least regulation.

Date14:44:49, May 05, 2012 CET
FromPatterson House
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of March 3299
MessageOOC: I didn't know that. I guess then I'll vote no.

Date15:13:26, May 05, 2012 CET
From Beluz Democratic Karavist Party
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of March 3299
MessageOOC: That's why I told you to leave Finance to me for now.
We're not even a tax burdenous nation, because our income tax serves for less than 30% of our GDP.

Date03:39:50, May 06, 2012 CET
From Beluz Democratic Karavist Party
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of March 3299
Message(If this bill passes)
Brace yourselves! We have another debt wave that would require us to raise taxes again!

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 17

no
     

Total Seats: 82

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Particracy does not allow official national flags of real-life nations or flags which are very prominent and recognisable (eg. the flags of the European Union, the United Nations, Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union or the Confederate States of America).

    Random quote: "I reject the cynical view that politics is a dirty business." - Richard M. Nixon

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 279