We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Greater Representation Act, 3299
Details
Submitted by[?]: Action Canrillaise (Rildanor)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 3303
Description[?]:
| To establish greater representation to the Sénat. This seat amount establishes a relative national ratio of just less than 275,000 citizens per one representative, compared to the current rate of just over 1,330,369 per representative. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The total number of seats in the legislative assembly. Should be between 75 and 750.
Old value:: 75
Current: 75
Proposed: 363
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:33:31, May 07, 2012 CET | From | Parti communiste rildanorien | To | Debating the Greater Representation Act, 3299 |
| Message | The workers would agree that this is good. |
| Date | 16:12:11, May 09, 2012 CET | From | La gauche verte | To | Debating the Greater Representation Act, 3299 |
| Message | Agree with the sentiments, although I cannot stop wondering why the unusual choice of 363? |
| Date | 21:50:44, May 11, 2012 CET | From | Action Canrillaise (Rildanor) | To | Debating the Greater Representation Act, 3299 |
| Message | "This seat amount establishes a relative national ratio of just less than 275,000 citizens per one representative". Further, another round number quotient choice would have resulted in an even number of seats, which could allow two parties to split the seats exactly in half. |
| Date | 21:56:28, May 11, 2012 CET | From | Action Canrillaise (Rildanor) | To | Debating the Greater Representation Act, 3299 |
| Message | However, as the population has decreased since this bill was proposed, the numbers warrant only 362 seats. However, despite this, we maintain that an odd number of seats should be used for the Sénat. |
| Date | 02:23:44, May 12, 2012 CET | From | La gauche verte | To | Debating the Greater Representation Act, 3299 |
| Message | I was wondering why not go further, for instance, to make the ratio smaller than 275,000? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 75 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Party organizations are eligible for deletion if they are over 50 in-game years old, do not have at least 1 active member or are historically significant and possess historically significant information. |
| Random quote: "If sunbeams were weapons of war, we would have had solar energy centuries ago." - George Porter |