We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Social Incentive Act Review
Details
Submitted by[?]: Grand Liberal Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 3302
Description[?]:
| A ten year cooling off period shall now be applied to this legislation, titles granted under this legislation should not be used during this time |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:10:33, May 10, 2012 CET | From | Grand Liberal Party | To | Debating the Social Incentive Act Review |
| Message | Given the strong feeling of both side of this argument the LP suggests a ten year cooling off period during which time the Act can be further examined and debated. For the sake of peace and national unity we urge all parties to accept this compromise. This legislation shall expire August 3311 M Clarke SW |
| Date | 14:33:01, May 10, 2012 CET | From | Coalition for National Unity [CNU] | To | Debating the Social Incentive Act Review |
| Message | "The Unionists are disappointed, though unsurprised, at the Liberal Party's decision to flip-flop on this issue. They back an Act of Senate in the House, get wrapped up in a corruption scandal out of the House and then return to the House to propose an Act to undo the original. Do they have an actual position on this issue or are they literally making this up as they go along? Needless to say, the Unionist Party sees no need to pass an Act to freeze something that has already been democratically agreed upon by a majority of the House. Quite frankly, the sooner the self-crowned Clarke family are out of Office, the more hope we have of reaching a conclusion to this affair." Sir Timothy Spicer, Unionist President |
| Date | 20:38:42, May 10, 2012 CET | From | Grand Liberal Party | To | Debating the Social Incentive Act Review |
| Message | "Members, we believe that in the light of recent tensions and inflamed view points, that what is needed in this nation is a period of cool calm reflection, and that is what we are calling for. If the Unionists want a Social Incentive system that will stand the test of time then they must realise that this House must move forwards in unity on this matter, otherwise the system lacks credibility and recognition. Indeed in such times any titles granted may become some of a curse than a blessing upon the individual to whom they are bestowed In addition the President has agreed that if all parties accept the cooling off period he will withdraw his draft cabinet proposal and leave the cabinet unchanged until after the next election. I believe this is a grand and generous offer which should be accepted by all who wish to see Solentia prosper and I coment it to the House." M Clarke SW |
| Date | 01:01:58, May 11, 2012 CET | From | Coalition for National Unity [CNU] | To | Debating the Social Incentive Act Review |
| Message | "The Unionists will not be held to ransom. If the Liberals want to play petty party politics with their cabinet proposals; that is their business. The Unionists shall take no part in such matters. We're statesmen, not politicos." Keir Georg Hollande, Unionist Vice-President (Legislative Lead) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 275 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 150 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: All role-play must respect the established cultural background in Culturally Protected nations. |
| Random quote: "Politics is the system of depriving the proletariat of their power." - Karl Marx |