We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Union Française
Details
Submitted by[?]: Action Canrillaise (Rildanor)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 3306
Description[?]:
This bill asks for the ratification of the Union Française. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Union Française.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 05:03:31, May 18, 2012 CET | From | La gauche verte | To | Debating the Ratification of the Union Française |
Message | "Union Française should also look to promote other similarities and common interests, such as the monarchy" Could you please elaborate on this? |
Date | 07:54:28, May 18, 2012 CET | From | Action Canrillaise (Rildanor) | To | Debating the Ratification of the Union Française |
Message | The monarchy between the four francophone nations (Rildanor, Kanjor, Lourenne, Alduria) is quite interconnected and a large party of the history, heritage and unity within and between these countries. By working together to promote our culture such as the monarchy and the principles of stability, and democracy, the francophone nations can grow stronger. This is what the specific clause is referencing. |
Date | 07:55:31, May 18, 2012 CET | From | Parti conservateur royaliste | To | Debating the Ratification of the Union Française |
Message | We do not agree with the provisions on education, gender. We will not agree to ratify the Union if there are binding laws on these issues. |
Date | 08:02:40, May 18, 2012 CET | From | Action Canrillaise (Rildanor) | To | Debating the Ratification of the Union Française |
Message | So the Parti conservateur royaliste is in opposition to the right to universal, sustainable, high quality education, and gender equality? Or would the Parti conservateur royaliste clarify its position? |
Date | 08:23:18, May 18, 2012 CET | From | Parti conservateur royaliste | To | Debating the Ratification of the Union Française |
Message | We do not agree with the provisions on education, gender. We will not agree to ratify the Union if there are binding laws on these issues. |
Date | 08:27:07, May 18, 2012 CET | From | Parti conservateur royaliste | To | Debating the Ratification of the Union Française |
Message | Education is a commodity, provided by the market at a certain cost. In itself it might be a right, but the quality is directly proportional to how much you pay. As for gender equality, we dont believe in it. |
Date | 08:35:09, May 18, 2012 CET | From | La gauche verte | To | Debating the Ratification of the Union Française |
Message | The GreenLeft in principle supports greater cooperation with other countries, and is therefore inclined to agree to ratify the Union, but for the clause on the monarchy. Nevertheless, for the sake of better relations and integration with other countries, the GreenLeft will ratify this Union in its current form. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes |
Total Seats: 248 | ||
no | Total Seats: 115 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: References to prominent real-life persons are not allowed. This includes references to philosophies featuring the name of a real-life person (eg. "Marxism", "Thatcherism", "Keynesianism"). |
Random quote: "Rarely is the question asked: is our children learning?" - George W. Bush |