Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5461
Next month in: 03:02:43
Server time: 08:57:16, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): friedrich3 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Justice Act 3305

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 3306

Description[?]:

Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime!

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:14:30, May 18, 2012 CET
FromSocialist Republican Party
ToDebating the Justice Act 3305
Message"Mr. Speaker, The Republican Party agrees that these propsals would indeed by tough on crime but what they are tougher on is liberty. This bill would place soldiers with guns in our streets, allow deportation to countries that practice torture, deprive the poor of right to defence and allow citizens to be detained without charge in the anme of localism!"

The Seator then got to his feet and began to chant

"They say police state! We say Welfare State! Police State."

Several other Republican senators then joined in:

"Welfare state!"

"Police state"

"Welfare state!"

The debate was then temporarily suspended while the offending Senator was removed from teh chamber and several other members of the Republican caucus were reprimanded for their actions.

Date19:15:18, May 18, 2012 CET
FromSocialist Republican Party
ToDebating the Justice Act 3305
Message*name

Date23:54:14, May 18, 2012 CET
FromAlorian Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Justice Act 3305
MessageThis is something that we cannot agree to. The police should not have the right to patrol private property unless there is a specific reason why they should be there ie conducting an investigation that has been approved by the courts.

Date15:47:03, May 19, 2012 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Justice Act 3305
MessageMr. Speaker,

The conservative party feels that the actions of the republican senators show it up to be the rabble rouser's that we believe them to be. That is no way to act in senate.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 38

no
    

Total Seats: 121

abstain
   

Total Seats: 91


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to make a reasonable effort to be accurate when communicating the rules to other players. Any player who manipulatively misleads another player about the rules will be subject to sanction.

Random quote: "Catch a man a fish, and you can sell it to him. Teach a man to fish, and you ruin a wonderful business opportunity." - Karl Marx

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 100