We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Nuclear Armament Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Conservative Conference
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2150
Description[?]:
| Its strange that the law currently states that we may use nuclear arms against a nation if they use them first, however we cannot currently make nuclear arms so how is it possible to retaliate? we need to make our constitution makes sense, because at the moment this issue just contradicts itself. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:40:10, December 03, 2005 CET | From | National Conservative Conference | To | Debating the Nuclear Armament Act |
| Message | sorry i forgot to put a proposal |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 68 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 104 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 28 |
| Random fact: Culturally Open nations can adopt advisory/non-enforceable Nation Descriptions. See http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6242 |
| Random quote: "Hence it comes about that all armed Prophets have been victorious, and all unarmed Prophets have been destroyed." - Niccolo Machiavelli |