We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Defence Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Traxian Imperial Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2151
Description[?]:
| These proposals are to allow smoother running of our defence infrastructure. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: The state owns all defence industries.
Current: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Proposed: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: The military acts as a de-facto police force, with powers of arrest.
Current: A civilian police force is in place and the military is not allowed to play any part in it.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the export of weapons to other nations.
Old value:: The government allows arms to be sold only to close allies.
Current: The government must approve all arms sales on a case by case basis.
Proposed: The government must approve all arms sales on a case by case basis.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:11:31, December 04, 2005 CET | From | United Soviet Party | To | Debating the Defence Act |
| Message | We agree |
| Date | 20:16:44, December 04, 2005 CET | From | Traxian Imperial Party | To | Debating the Defence Act |
| Message | We are pushing this through to get it sorted before the August 2051 elections. |
| Date | 02:35:49, December 05, 2005 CET | From | People's Progressive Party | To | Debating the Defence Act |
| Message | Seems like a good enough compromise. |
| Date | 04:16:17, December 05, 2005 CET | From | Nationalist Party of Gaduridos | To | Debating the Defence Act |
| Message | Ugh, would rather this have been split... we'll vote for, though |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 379 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 62 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The Real-Life Equivalents Index is a valuable resource for finding out the in-game equivalents of real-life cultures, languages, religions, people and places: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6731 |
| Random quote: "Perhaps the fact that we have seen millions voting themselves into complete dependence on a tyrant has made our generation understand that to choose one's government is not necessarily to secure freedom." - Friedrich Hayek |