We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: RFP, CP and RSDP ecological reform bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2152
Description[?]:
| Article 22 (Government policy regarding a national park system.) Article 29 (The government's policy regarding the keeping of wild animals as pets.) |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy regarding a national park system.
Old value:: The government designates ecological preservation zones but does not fund their oversight.
Current: The government devolves park policy to local governments.
Proposed: The government funds and maintains a network of national parks and/or marine protected areas.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the keeping of wild animals as pets.
Old value:: All wild animals may be kept as pets, without any restrictions or precautions whatsoever.
Current: The government maintains a list of dangerous wild animals which may not be kept as pets; other wild animals may be kept as pets.
Proposed: Wild animals may be kept as pets; the owners of dangerous wild animals must take the necessary measures to ensure they can't escape.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:23:23, December 04, 2005 CET | From | Radical Freedom Party | To | Debating the RFP, CP and RSDP ecological reform bill |
| Message | We will support this bill if there is a rationale behind it. |
| Date | 21:42:22, December 04, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the RFP, CP and RSDP ecological reform bill |
| Message | Note the ecological bit. I think that "having ecological preservation zones but not funding them" defeats the purpose of having a zone.... |
| Date | 21:47:30, December 04, 2005 CET | From | Radical Freedom Party | To | Debating the RFP, CP and RSDP ecological reform bill |
| Message | We share that view with the Conservative Party. |
| Date | 21:39:42, December 05, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Imperialist Party | To | Debating the RFP, CP and RSDP ecological reform bill |
| Message | Nah. Half of this isnt even ecological, and the other half is of questionable ecological value. |
| Date | 23:27:10, December 05, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian Alcoholic Party II | To | Debating the RFP, CP and RSDP ecological reform bill |
| Message | The whole point of ecological preservation is to have the areas be natural and untampered with by humans. Overseeing them negates their naturalness. As for the right to bear dangerous wild animals, we won't support anything which takes that away or restricts it. And if anyone does we'll sick our tigers on them. |
| Date | 21:54:35, December 06, 2005 CET | From |  RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the RFP, CP and RSDP ecological reform bill |
| Message | Indeed, half of it is about civil rights! We will not tolerate a Government Coalition which opposes the right not to be eaten by your neighbour's pet tiger. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 230 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 305 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 64 |
| Random fact: References to prominent real-life persons are not allowed. This includes references to philosophies featuring the name of a real-life person (eg. "Marxism", "Thatcherism", "Keynesianism"). |
| Random quote: "They should rule who are able to rule best." - Aristotle |