We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of October 3329
Details
Submitted by[?]: labor party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 3330
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Green Liberal Party Of Tukarali
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the 
Foster Care Survivors Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Green Liberal Party Of Tukarali
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Foster Care Survivors Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Green Liberal Party Of Tukarali
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Green Liberal Party Of Tukarali
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Green Liberal Party Of Tukarali
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Green Liberal Party Of Tukarali
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the labor party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Green Liberal Party Of Tukarali
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the labor party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Foster Care Survivors Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Green Liberal Party Of Tukarali
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:57:07, July 05, 2012 CET | From | Green Liberal Party Of Tukarali | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3329 |
| Message | The GLPoT is seriously considering this coalition but holds reservations about forming a government with a right wing party and awaits the opinion of the AFC party |
| Date | 18:38:51, July 05, 2012 CET | From | Foster Care Survivors Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3329 |
| Message | OOC: I too would consider this, however I need to know more about the game. I'm relatively new. I have a couple of questions before I go back IC (In Charactor) 1. Why would a party propose a cabinet where they are only on two Ministries/portfolios? What's the motive? 2. In this Cabinet Scenario: If for example the Green Liberal and Afterfostercare parties do not agree with the defence/offence positions of the Conservitive Party (CP), does it mean that because the CP holds that Ministry/Portfolio they can overrule our votes of NO on any Bill about defence the CPs introduce or does it all hinge on the number of seats? |
| Date | 19:40:37, July 05, 2012 CET | From | Foster Care Survivors Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3329 |
| Message | If we were to accept any proposal at this time we are only interested in the Health and Social Services portfolio |
| Date | 11:03:49, July 06, 2012 CET | From | União Democrática do Tukarali | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3329 |
| Message | OOC: Regarding the AFC questions: 1. I could only speculate about the motives of the "conservitive" party, but it seems obvious that they are prepared to put up with a distribution of cabinet seats that is disadvantageous for them because they hope to ensure that this proposal passes. The TDU, on the other hand, would only make cabinet proposals that bear some relation to the respective parliamenatary strengths of the parties involved. 2. Game-mechanics wise it all hinges on the number of seats, but parties could always come to voluntary arrangements where the party holding a certain portfolio determines policies in that area. As I said, such arrangements are voluntary, and the "conservitive" party could only overrule the other two parties in this possible cabinet in defence matters if those two parties agree to be overruled (or, with the current distribution of seats, they get the support of the TDU). |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 18 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 107 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: If you have a question, post it on the forum. Game Moderators and other players will be happy to help you. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "The packaging for a microwavable 'microwave' dinner is programmed for a shelf life of maybe six months, a cook time of two minutes and a landfill dead-time of centuries." - David Wann |