We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Compendium Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Classical Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2153
Description[?]:
A BILL TO.... Do alota stuff. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change National, cultural and historic sites and monuments.
Old value:: The state encourages and funds private efforts towards the protection of cultural and historical heritage.
Current: The state actively protects scenery, localities, cultural, and historical sites; it maintains an agency to preserve them untouched if public interest so requires.
Proposed: The state does not undertake any action towards the protection of cultural and historical heritage.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Ownership of guns by private individuals.
Old value:: Adult individuals may own guns under strict license conditions.
Current: Individuals are not permitted to own firearms under any circumstances.
Proposed: Individuals are allowed to own firearms as long as they do not have a history of dangerous mental illness or a violent criminality.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change International trade (this is a default in the absense of a specific free trade agreement or specific trade embargo)
Old value:: The nation imposes reciprocal tariffs on imports, with no tariffs imposed on states which impose no tariffs on our exports.
Current: The nation allows for imports, but imposes tariffs and quotas in certain areas.
Proposed: The nation does not impose any tariffs or quotas on imports.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 01:01:44, December 05, 2005 CET | From | Anti-Ownership Federation Party | To | Debating the Compendium Bill |
Message | no, no, no and guess what.......... NO |
Date | 04:28:47, December 05, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Compendium Bill |
Message | No, Maybe, Maybe, No. Make a stronger case for the #2, and #3. |
Date | 05:37:47, December 05, 2005 CET | From | Federation Under Crazy Killers -- United | To | Debating the Compendium Bill |
Message | 1. Yes 2. Yes 3. Yes 4. No |
Date | 09:13:05, December 05, 2005 CET | From | United Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the Compendium Bill |
Message | 1. No - what is wrong with government encouraging private efforts towards the protection of Telamonian heritage? - we must protect our history 2. Convince me 3. No 4. Yes, this I can support |
Date | 12:39:05, December 05, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Compendium Bill |
Message | no NO yes NO |
Date | 14:27:08, December 05, 2005 CET | From | Rationalist Party | To | Debating the Compendium Bill |
Message | I can't agree with any of these |
Date | 23:30:14, December 05, 2005 CET | From | Classical Party | To | Debating the Compendium Bill |
Message | 1. We need to tax the public and spend their money setting up Kwanza heritage institutions. (note sarcasm) 2. To provide greater personal freedom to those who need protection. Gun control laws do nothing to prevent criminals from commiting crimes. Nearly all gun related crimes are by illegally owned weaponry. All gun control does is prevent the public from adequete personal protection. 3. #3 is a personal opinion. On second consideration I will take it out. 4. Tarrifs and quotas in trade is protectionism. It makes the economy tank in the long run. This was the reason for the formation of the Constitutional Convention (American), because the states were imposing ridiculous tariffs that killed the economy. |
Date | 03:14:54, December 06, 2005 CET | From | Anti-Ownership Federation Party | To | Debating the Compendium Bill |
Message | "1. We need to tax the public and spend their money setting up Kwanza heritage institutions. (note sarcasm)" Yes.. (note lack of sarcasm) 2. Guns don't provide protection 4. you suck, america sucks........ |
Date | 03:22:33, December 06, 2005 CET | From | Classical Party | To | Debating the Compendium Bill |
Message | i do love how we reduce ourselves to personal attacks to belabor points we cannot back up i'm laughing on the floor really no seriously so funny... |
Date | 03:23:21, December 06, 2005 CET | From | Classical Party | To | Debating the Compendium Bill |
Message | i do love how we reduce ourselves to personal attacks to belabor points we cannot back up i'm laughing on the floor really no seriously so funny... |
Date | 14:22:10, December 06, 2005 CET | From | Rationalist Party | To | Debating the Compendium Bill |
Message | Our current tarrif policy is entirely reciprical, so we do not resort to protectionism unless another nation's protectionism is affecting our exporters. Actually, most gun crimes occur in the home. Personal firearms are a poor protection against determined assault and greatly increase the number of accidental and passion murders |
Date | 19:44:48, December 06, 2005 CET | From | United Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the Compendium Bill |
Message | The current laws on the protection of national heritage are fine as far as we are concerned. So far as i can see in the current law there is no provision or suggestion that people are taxed to set up any institution. It simply says that the government promotes PRIVATE efforts to protect Telamonian heritage and can provide them with the odd grant if necessary. There is no question of complete or regular government funding and this certainly need not come out of taxation (for example it could come out of a national lottery or something - i.e. something entirely optional for people to participate in) and the institutions are private. |
Date | 11:10:28, December 08, 2005 CET | From | Anti-Ownership Federation Party | To | Debating the Compendium Bill |
Message | i really find it funny how you take everything so seriously and are typing like this also stop making stupid bills |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 92 | ||||||
no |
Total Seats: 138 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 25 |
Random fact: You can inactivate yourself on your User Page. You will then lose all your seats but your party account won't be deleted, and your party's Visibility ratings will not diminish. Reactivation can be requested in the "Reactivation Requests" thread in the Game Moderation section of the Particracy Forum. |
Random quote: "In our age, there is no such thing as 'keeping out of politics.' All issues are political issues, and politics itself is a mass of lies, evasions, folly, hatred and schizophrenia." - George Orwell |