We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Professional Military Act of 3339
Details
Submitted by[?]: Takanashi Clan
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 3339
Description[?]:
| This act calls for the establishment of a unified military force command for Beluzia, which can, in emergency, override the military force of local parishes. It also re-establish the core of the Beluzian military as a professional full-time army, with reserves as reserved manpower for mobilisation. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change National military policy.
Old value:: The government assigns military control to local governments
Current: The nation retains a full time, professional army, navy and air force.
Proposed: The nation retains a full time, professional army, navy and air force.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:25:37, July 24, 2012 CET | From |  Beluz Democratic Karavist Party | To | Debating the Professional Military Act of 3339 |
| Message | OOC: This is why I wanted the "Port Tackstov Charter" signed. If this bill passes, Beluzia's system no longer makes sense. |
| Date | 14:33:13, July 24, 2012 CET | From | Beluz Democratic Karavist Party | To | Debating the Professional Military Act of 3339 |
| Message | OOC: I was talking to the mods about military size; we already use the correct accord which isn't affected by legislation, so our neutral military is unaffected by legislation. If this passes, all the calculations I did would have been a waste: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=344680 Paramilitary calculations will change, for no reason. This won't have an effect on our national military, because it will remain the same regardless of legislation. The only thing that will change is the set of calculations on my spreadsheets. |
| Date | 14:44:38, July 24, 2012 CET | From | Takanashi Clan | To | Debating the Professional Military Act of 3339 |
| Message | OOC: In such case, please work on the respective charter and sign it, so that future mistakes of similar nature will not happen again. |
| Date | 14:51:45, July 24, 2012 CET | From | Beluz Democratic Karavist Party | To | Debating the Professional Military Act of 3339 |
| Message | OOC: I already worked on it and that's what it was meant to do. http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreaty.php?treatyid=2248 I can't submit it to the legislature now because this bill is being voted on. This is what comes up when I try to propose it: "Your nation can currently not ratify this treaty because you have pending legislation which conflicts with this treaty." If it passes, it makes it worse because then it can't be signed. It will say: "Your nation is not in compliance with this treaty. If you wish to ratify this treaty, first alter your legislation to reflect the articles outlined in the treaty." |
| Date | 14:55:35, July 24, 2012 CET | From | Takanashi Clan | To | Debating the Professional Military Act of 3339 |
| Message | OOC: Please wait for this act to be defeated, on such case. |
| Date | 15:06:44, July 24, 2012 CET | From | Beluz Democratic Karavist Party | To | Debating the Professional Military Act of 3339 |
| Message | OOC: I don't think it will be defeated; that's my concern. It would be the perfect time to have it defeated, because we have a 2/3 supermajority that we could use to pass the treaty. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 43 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 47 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 9 |
| Random fact: Particracy isn't just a game, it also has a forum, where players meet up to discuss role-playing, talk about in-game stuff, run their own newspaper or organisation and even discuss non-game and real-life issues! Check it out: http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "The communist revolution is the most radical rupture with traditional property relations; no wonder that its development involves the most radical rupture with traditional ideas." - Karl Marx |