Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 02:30:19
Server time: 17:29:40, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Basic Bureaucratic Changes to the Republiek van Seridjan Law Proposal System

Details

Submitted by[?]: Capitalists Under Plutocratic Auspices

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 3343

Description[?]:

CONSIDERING:

The CUPAs are the only one here, and

We want it this way,

RESOLVES:

To expand more proposals because they should only be limited if jerks play.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:42:28, July 28, 2012 CET
FromAl Jabha al-Queranzīa Badariyā
ToDebating the Basic Bureaucratic Changes to the Republiek van Seridjan Law Proposal System
MessageIT IS NICE THAT U LEFT BADARA

Date02:19:31, July 28, 2012 CET
FromRed Vanguard Dominion
ToDebating the Basic Bureaucratic Changes to the Republiek van Seridjan Law Proposal System
MessageYES IT IS.
I have already bribed the second place party and offered them useless positions in my dictatorship cabinet.

IN THE AFTERNOON
I hope to pass 15 more cabinet proposals

THEN MAYBE I'LL CHANGE A LAW
Just kidding. Al Democraty needs power more than Al'Badara need to abolish slavery.

Date20:28:58, July 28, 2012 CET
FromRed Vanguard Dominion
ToDebating the Basic Bureaucratic Changes to the Republiek van Seridjan Law Proposal System
MessageOOC:
Well hey,

I know limiting them seems jerkish, but some nations are more slow and steady. Like Zardugal, our mortal enemies, I believe they limit proposals. It allows for a wordier, more rich political dialogue type game inside the nation.

I mean sometimes you want to play where you actually change people's minds about laws and ideas, and sway their vote. Limited proposals forces that.)

Date22:15:19, July 30, 2012 CET
From Capitalists Under Plutocratic Auspices
ToDebating the Basic Bureaucratic Changes to the Republiek van Seridjan Law Proposal System
MessageAl'Democraty,

You suck at this game. It isn't fun when the only proposals you make are for cabinets. I am new to this game. You clearly are not therefore you get to do everything and muck this up for everyone else. One party in Al'Badara kept urging that others should get a turn, that it is best for everyone. The other kept rambling about restoring the republic and that apparently means boring the hell out of the rest of us. I fled Al'Badara because I couldn't take your incessant cabinet proposals and whining.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 449

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain

      Total Seats: 0


      Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation.

      Random quote: "A man who has no office to go to - I don't care who he is - is a trial of which you can have no conception." - George Bernard Shaw

      This page was generated with PHP
      Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
      Queries performed: 56