We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Basic Bureaucratic Changes to the Republiek van Seridjan Law Proposal System
Details
Submitted by[?]: Capitalists Under Plutocratic Auspices
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 3343
Description[?]:
CONSIDERING: The CUPAs are the only one here, and We want it this way, RESOLVES: To expand more proposals because they should only be limited if jerks play. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The number of proposals a party can introduce per year (will be handed out as a monthly quota).
Old value:: 12
Current: 20
Proposed: 20
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The maximum proposal quota a party can accumulate.
Old value:: 25
Current: 50
Proposed: 50
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The professional retirement age.
Old value:: 65
Current: 65
Proposed: 70
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 01:42:28, July 28, 2012 CET | From | Al Jabha al-Queranzīa Badariyā | To | Debating the Basic Bureaucratic Changes to the Republiek van Seridjan Law Proposal System |
Message | IT IS NICE THAT U LEFT BADARA |
Date | 02:19:31, July 28, 2012 CET | From | Red Vanguard Dominion | To | Debating the Basic Bureaucratic Changes to the Republiek van Seridjan Law Proposal System |
Message | YES IT IS. I have already bribed the second place party and offered them useless positions in my dictatorship cabinet. IN THE AFTERNOON I hope to pass 15 more cabinet proposals THEN MAYBE I'LL CHANGE A LAW Just kidding. Al Democraty needs power more than Al'Badara need to abolish slavery. |
Date | 20:28:58, July 28, 2012 CET | From | Red Vanguard Dominion | To | Debating the Basic Bureaucratic Changes to the Republiek van Seridjan Law Proposal System |
Message | OOC: Well hey, I know limiting them seems jerkish, but some nations are more slow and steady. Like Zardugal, our mortal enemies, I believe they limit proposals. It allows for a wordier, more rich political dialogue type game inside the nation. I mean sometimes you want to play where you actually change people's minds about laws and ideas, and sway their vote. Limited proposals forces that.) |
Date | 22:15:19, July 30, 2012 CET | From | Capitalists Under Plutocratic Auspices | To | Debating the Basic Bureaucratic Changes to the Republiek van Seridjan Law Proposal System |
Message | Al'Democraty, You suck at this game. It isn't fun when the only proposals you make are for cabinets. I am new to this game. You clearly are not therefore you get to do everything and muck this up for everyone else. One party in Al'Badara kept urging that others should get a turn, that it is best for everyone. The other kept rambling about restoring the republic and that apparently means boring the hell out of the rest of us. I fled Al'Badara because I couldn't take your incessant cabinet proposals and whining. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |
yes | Total Seats: 449 | |
no | Total Seats: 0 | |
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
Random quote: "A man who has no office to go to - I don't care who he is - is a trial of which you can have no conception." - George Bernard Shaw |