Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5474
Next month in: 03:49:01
Server time: 04:10:58, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Siffrin | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Religous Reform

Details

Submitted by[?]: House of Astredies

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 3342

Description[?]:

I have observed some practices that discriminate against religion and I intend to correct them.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:32:42, July 30, 2012 CET
From Beluz Democratic Karavist Party
ToDebating the Religous Reform
MessageThere is only one way to stop discrimination against religion: we should exterminate all non-Takanashi religious entities.

Date02:42:33, July 30, 2012 CET
From Takanashi Clan
ToDebating the Religous Reform
MessageOOC: Wait, what?

Date03:03:10, July 30, 2012 CET
From Beluz Democratic Karavist Party
ToDebating the Religous Reform
MessageOOC: lol :P

Date03:28:10, July 30, 2012 CET
From Takanashi Clan
ToDebating the Religous Reform
MessageOOC: In any case we do support that idea ICly, and has been working on colonising Negunia for a while. Although the draft is going to be banned, I will try to work on it to see if we can evade that law and have drafts anyway, and to reorganise Negunia in the image of Bailon. But in any case, my reaction is still "wait, what?" :p

Date02:02:00, July 31, 2012 CET
FromHouse of Astredies
ToDebating the Religous Reform
MessageI would think that the Takanashi Clan would support a policy that favors religion and I am curious to hear their arguement against it.

Date04:46:34, July 31, 2012 CET
From Beluz Democratic Karavist Party
ToDebating the Religous Reform
MessageIt's common sense regarding security.
I'm sad that the House of Barbossa hasn't considered the last set of arguments held on the same issue:
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=350668
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=352491

Date07:09:40, July 31, 2012 CET
From Takanashi Clan
ToDebating the Religous Reform
MessageOOC: You will think that a house of theofascists will not support the freedom of foreign missionaries, considering that they are not spreading our faith, and thus are competing with us.

Date07:13:08, July 31, 2012 CET
From Beluz Democratic Karavist Party
ToDebating the Religous Reform
MessageOOC:

Your clan may more likely support screening on a person-by-person basis ;)

Date07:17:06, July 31, 2012 CET
From Takanashi Clan
ToDebating the Religous Reform
MessageOOC: This is probably true, but failing that or banning foreign missionaries altogether, we would at least want to have records of them, or anything other than free movement. :P

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 49

no
  

Total Seats: 36

abstain
 

Total Seats: 14


Random fact: Moderation will not approve a Cultural Protocol request within the first 48 hours of it being requested. This is in order to give other players a chance to query the proposed changes, if they wish to do so. Moderation may be approached for advice on a proposed change, but any advice proffered should always be understood under the provisio that no final decision will be made until at least 48 hours after the request has been formally submitted for approval.

Random quote: "How we can possibly be giving £1bn a month, when we're in this sort of debt, to Bongo Bongo Land is completely beyond me." - Godfrey Bloom

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 60