Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5461
Next month in: 03:38:46
Server time: 08:21:13, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Bill NLA-47 Censorship Liberalization Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Progressive Democratic Alliance

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2152

Description[?]:

The New Liberal Alliance stands firmly against censorship and as thus will allow hard-core pornography to be legal. If we think about it, how can we enforce such laws if it is part of an individual's sex and private life? Many will still find ways to broadcast such material over the airwaves and I am sure that if we liberalize such content only certain channels will have it at designated periods... as the saying goes: "whatever floats your boat".

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date05:27:38, December 06, 2005 CET
FromSocialist Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Bill NLA-47 Censorship Liberalization Act
MessageHard-core and violent sexually explicit content is degrading to women and promotes skewed views of sex (for example, most hard-core and violent sexual content shows the woman as a tool to be exploited for a man's pleasure).

Date05:29:34, December 06, 2005 CET
FromSocialist Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Bill NLA-47 Censorship Liberalization Act
MessagePlease vote for my bill instead that will permit all sexually explicit material to be shown on television except for hard-core and violent content of that nature. Another thing, why would you want to allow violent sexual content?

Date05:40:57, December 06, 2005 CET
FromProgressive Democratic Alliance
ToDebating the Bill NLA-47 Censorship Liberalization Act
MessageViolent: maybe not but I can give leeway to hard-core. After all, it's not like you or any other party can control the lives of our citizens. We shouldn't interfere with the private lives of citizens unless they harm others and this is one case. If some people want a channel to watch this kind of material than let them, if you don't like the channel, don't watch it. It's really quite simple.

Date06:29:17, December 06, 2005 CET
FromSocialist Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Bill NLA-47 Censorship Liberalization Act
MessageWell, you don't want violent sexually explicit content, and yet your bill will allow it.

Date06:50:48, December 06, 2005 CET
FromSocialist Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Bill NLA-47 Censorship Liberalization Act
MessageWhat the hell, I'll vote for it now. But I will later attempt to ban violent and hard-core content of this nature from television.

Date14:03:44, December 06, 2005 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Bill NLA-47 Censorship Liberalization Act
MessageAKA: "The Child Pron Act"

Date14:03:59, December 06, 2005 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Bill NLA-47 Censorship Liberalization Act
MessageWell Children watching Porn Act

Date02:33:36, December 07, 2005 CET
FromSocialist Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Bill NLA-47 Censorship Liberalization Act
MessageRestrictions on children watching graphic sexual material is actually a separate topic. There is another law regarding whether children should be prevented from watching televised explicit material.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 75

no
   

Total Seats: 77

abstain
  

Total Seats: 49


Random fact: Information about the population of each country can be found on the Population Information thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=8663

Random quote: "To refuse political equality is to rob the ostracized of all self-respect." - Elizabeth Cady Stanton

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 59