We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Defence Industry Subsidation
Details
Submitted by[?]: Darnussian Strength Initiative
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2152
Description[?]:
| . |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: Defence industries are privately owned and not subsidised.
Current: Defence industries are privately owned and not subsidised.
Proposed: Defence industries are privately owned but subsidised by the state.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:40:17, December 07, 2005 CET | From | Socialist Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Defence Industry Subsidation |
| Message | Well, it's a step in the right direction. I voted yes. |
| Date | 00:05:45, December 08, 2005 CET | From | Progressive Democratic Alliance | To | Debating the Defence Industry Subsidation |
| Message | Why should we subsidize defence industries? We already buy their product. |
| Date | 00:47:03, December 08, 2005 CET | From | Darnussian Strength Initiative | To | Debating the Defence Industry Subsidation |
| Message | Subsidation can be used to steer industries towards those products that our government would be most interested in purchasing. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 88 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 76 | ||||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 37 |
| Random fact: Make sure to check out Particracy's wiki. http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page |
| Random quote: "If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared." - Niccolo Machiavelli |