We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Recycling Act 3351
Details
Submitted by[?]: Rifondazione Socialista - A.S.
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 3352
Description[?]:
. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government-sponsored recycling programs.
Old value:: Local governments decide about this.
Current: Local governments decide about this.
Proposed: The government funds recycling facilities and enforces mandatory recycling for residents, commercial enterprise, and industry.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:51:47, August 17, 2012 CET | From | Quanzari Restorationists | To | Debating the Recycling Act 3351 |
Message | We like the idea of recycling. We would support your bill, but we prefer to let the local governors decide this. Ci piace l'idea di riciclaggio. Siamo il vostro conto, ma noi preferiamo lasciare l'amministrazione locale decidere questo. |
Date | 12:23:56, August 18, 2012 CET | From | Popolari per l'Istalia - U.o.L. | To | Debating the Recycling Act 3351 |
Message | siamo daccordo con QR (we agreed with QR) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 39 | |||
no | Total Seats: 36 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Moderation will not approve a Cultural Protocol request within the first 48 hours of it being requested. This is in order to give other players a chance to query the proposed changes, if they wish to do so. Moderation may be approached for advice on a proposed change, but any advice proffered should always be understood under the provisio that no final decision will be made until at least 48 hours after the request has been formally submitted for approval. |
Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |