We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: UCA Policing Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Liberal Alliance
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2152
Description[?]:
- |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The weapons used by police forces.
Old value:: Police officers carry standard firearms.
Current: Police officers may only carry non-lethal weapons apart from specially trained firearms units.
Proposed: Police officers may only carry non-lethal weapons apart from specially trained firearms units.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 04:03:50, December 07, 2005 CET | From | Classical Party | To | Debating the UCA Policing Act |
Message | If people are allowed to carry weaponry, why cant a police officer? |
Date | 08:00:19, December 07, 2005 CET | From | Anti-Ownership Federation Party | To | Debating the UCA Policing Act |
Message | people shouldnt be allowed to carry weaponry |
Date | 09:16:39, December 07, 2005 CET | From | United Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the UCA Policing Act |
Message | I don't really see the need why anyone should carry weaponry - anyway, so far as I'm concerned the British policing system works relatively well and it is a largely unarmed force with some specialist firearms units. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes | Total Seats: 36 | ||||||
no |
Total Seats: 179 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 40 |
Random fact: "Spamming", or the indiscriminate posting of unsolicited messages, is not allowed. |
Random quote: "I am a conservative to preserve all that is good in our constitution, a radical to remove all that is bad. I seek to preserve property and to respect order, and I equally decry the appeal to the passions of the many or the prejudices of the few." - Benjamin Disraeli |