We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Defence Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Dorvische Zentristischen Partei
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 3360
Description[?]:
Defence Act |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Civil defence is the government's policy on providing shelters to be used in the event of attacks on major cities, mainly nuclear attacks and bombing.
Old value:: The government builds and maintains a network of shelters across the nation.
Current: The government builds and maintains a network of shelters across the nation.
Proposed: Local authorities are responsible for building and maintaining shelters.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards the use of land mines by the army.
Old value:: The Government leaves this to the army to decide upon.
Current: The use of land mines is allowed but restricted.
Proposed: The use of land mines is allowed but restricted.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Current: A civilian police force is in place and the military is not allowed to play any part in it.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place, backed up by the military.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 14:11:04, September 02, 2012 CET | From | Radikalen für Dorvik | To | Debating the Defence Act |
Message | OOC: You mix a lot of different subjects into one bill which forces us to break our visibility in some way. My party ICly agrees with 3 points but disagrees with 3 others, etc. This is bad for my visibility. |
Date | 19:06:14, September 02, 2012 CET | From | Dorvische Zentristischen Partei | To | Debating the Defence Act |
Message | Visibility? you lose Visibility because I mix different subjects. I didn't know about that, I will correct it in future bills I am sorry. |
Date | 19:07:29, September 02, 2012 CET | From | Dorvische Zentristischen Partei | To | Debating the Defence Act |
Message | say wich ones you disagree please. |
Date | 20:00:36, September 02, 2012 CET | From | Radikalen für Dorvik | To | Debating the Defence Act |
Message | OOC: No, no. You have different subjects into one bill. Say like two about civil rights and two about the environment and two about religion. You mix all those in one bill meaning they decide the visibility on all three subjects. Chances we agree with all or disagree with all are very small, forcing us to vote no or yes on subjects we agree or disagree with. Just separate them and we can vote. |
Date | 11:59:56, September 03, 2012 CET | From | Dorvische Zentristischen Partei | To | Debating the Defence Act |
Message | RIght |
Date | 03:58:56, September 04, 2012 CET | From | Dorvischnationale Volkspartei | To | Debating the Defence Act |
Message | Herr Speakers, We agree with article 3 and article 3 solely, the rest will bring shame to Dorvik. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||
no | Total Seats: 500 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The grey space in the east is populated by the forum-based countries, known in-game as the former colonies or the "Third World". These countries are managed by the Third World Coordinator but players can request control of individual countries in the Third World Control Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=8302 |
Random quote: "Morality is simply the attitude we adopt towards people whom we personally dislike." - Oscar Wilde |