We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Monarchy/Federalist Motion
Details
Submitted by[?]: The Dolgavan Conservative Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 3376
Description[?]:
A motion to bring all parties together to discuss the change of the monarchy to maybe a new member of the royal family or to a voting presidency. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:38:52, October 04, 2012 CET |
From | Vigs Partija ('Whigs') | To | Debating the Monarchy/Federalist Motion | Message | It is, remember the royal house Rothringen-Ludwig is a RESTORED monarchy, i.e. it has roots extending further back than the Greens care to admit. |
Date | 14:07:07, October 05, 2012 CET |
From | United Centrist Party | To | Debating the Monarchy/Federalist Motion | Message | Currently, the UCP has not formulated a position on the question of the monarchy. That being said, we do find it strange that Dolgava has an elected representative of the republic as head of state, not the monarch itself. This strikes out as somewhat odd that the queen or king isn't technically our head of state. It may make the point monarchy rather meaningless. |
Date | 14:09:37, October 05, 2012 CET |
From | United Centrist Party | To | Debating the Monarchy/Federalist Motion | Message | Currently, the UCP has not formulated a position on the question of the monarchy. That being said, we do find it strange that Dolgava has an elected representative of the republic as head of state, not the monarch itself. This strikes out as somewhat odd that the queen or king isn't technically our head of state. It may make the point monarchy rather meaningless. |
Date | 14:10:16, October 05, 2012 CET |
From | United Centrist Party | To | Debating the Monarchy/Federalist Motion | Message | OOC: Correction. "we do find it strange that Dolgava has an elected representative of the monarchy" rather than republic.
Damn, the above post was awful. It's an ungodly hour here in New Zealand and I guess I'm just not thinking and as I should be. |
Date | 18:14:52, October 05, 2012 CET |
From | Vigs Partija ('Whigs') | To | Debating the Monarchy/Federalist Motion | Message | The principle is designed as a constitutional monarchism. This way our glorious monarch is above from mere politics, and be the symbol of eternal unity for the nation. The HoS this way is above petty politics. |
subscribe to this discussion -
unsubscribeVoting
Vote |
Seats |
yes | Total Seats: 0 |
no | Total Seats: 52 |
abstain | Total Seats: 249 |
Random fact: Character names must appear plausible and should consist of at least a first name and a surname. Exceptions to this will only be granted at Moderation's discretion and where a very strong case has been presented |
Random quote: "We pursue no other aim than freedom from oppression, liberty from lies, salvation from irrationality!" - Julius Callus, former Davostani politician |