We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Nuclear Weapon Re-Assignment Pt 1
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Party of Baltusia
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2153
Description[?]:
| The nuclear corps are a deterrent, and we believe we should re-assign them thus. However, we are bound by the WMD Limitation Treaty. The options we would like to take are "In retaliation to an attack" or "In retaliation to a WMD attack". These cannot be chosen under the terms of the treaty. |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the WMD Limitation Treaty.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 09:01:03, December 09, 2005 CET | From |  Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX | To | Debating the Nuclear Weapon Re-Assignment Pt 1 |
| Message | So this is the first step on the way to ending a nuclear weapons program? |
| Date | 09:05:22, December 09, 2005 CET | From | Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX | To | Debating the Nuclear Weapon Re-Assignment Pt 1 |
| Message | Or are you trying to get Baltusia to have first strike capabilities? |
| Date | 15:25:55, December 09, 2005 CET | From | National Party of Baltusia | To | Debating the Nuclear Weapon Re-Assignment Pt 1 |
| Message | This is simply using a new classification, more suited to what the nuclear corps are already providing. |
| Date | 02:34:33, December 10, 2005 CET | From | Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Nuclear Weapon Re-Assignment Pt 1 |
| Message | Hardly - at this point, the nuclear corps wait until we are attacked, in which case nuclear weapons can come under construction, and should others attack us with them they may be deployed in turn. Withdrawing from this treaty would state to the International Community that that is no longer policy, that we are prepared to launch nuclear weapons first. We reject that alteration as foolish and shortsighted. |
| Date | 04:13:53, December 10, 2005 CET | From | Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX | To | Debating the Nuclear Weapon Re-Assignment Pt 1 |
| Message | Indeed, the actual structure of the NCB is more orientated to the current state of affairs than what you are proposing. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 147 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 148 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 47 |
| Random fact: Head to the "Language assistance" thread to receive and offer help with translations: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6368 |
| Random quote: "I say myself that I am beautiful, and I think that all woman strive to look like me.“ - Melissa Hargreaves, former Dranian politician |