We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Constitutional Reform Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Independent Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 3387
Description[?]:
| The proposed changes will enhance our political process. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The constitutional right and responsibility to propose a cabinet to the legislature.
Old value:: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Current: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Proposed: Only the Head of State can propose a cabinet coalition.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:40:29, October 25, 2012 CET | From | Independent Party | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform Act |
| Message | Will leave it up for debate for a while. |
| Date | 12:59:41, October 25, 2012 CET | From | Green & Liberal Socialist Party | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform Act |
| Message | OOC: This will give the role of president some meaning in the game. |
| Date | 13:02:26, October 25, 2012 CET | From | Green & Liberal Socialist Party | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform Act |
| Message | OOC: This will give the role of president some meaning in the game. |
| Date | 20:41:26, October 25, 2012 CET | From | Independent Party | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform Act |
| Message | OCC: From my experience playing this game for a while now, I've noticed that it becomes quite messy when anyone can propose a cabinet. Win the presidential election and you get to propose a cabinet. Makes it more interesting, in my opinion. |
| Date | 21:31:36, October 25, 2012 CET | From | Green & Liberal Socialist Party | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform Act |
| Message | OOC: Yeah I agree, I'll vote in favour of a reform, the Presidential election's just such a pointless aspect of the game if not. What other options are there for cabinet proposals? Is there an option for Presidential and Largest party? |
| Date | 01:33:53, October 26, 2012 CET | From | Independent Party | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform Act |
| Message | OCC: No other option that I'm aware of. |
| Date | 17:12:53, October 26, 2012 CET | From | Green & Liberal Socialist Party | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform Act |
| Message | OOC: Well I'm sure there's an option that the largest party can be the only ones to propose a cabinet, I'd recommend this be used. |
| Date | 06:26:22, October 27, 2012 CET | From | Independent Party | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform Act |
| Message | OOC: I don't think a political party should be the one to propose cabinets. It's the President's cabinet so whoever controls that position should be the one to propose the cabinet. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 325 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life fictional references (eg. Gandalf, Harry Potter, Luke Skywalker). |
| Random quote: "Erotic politicians, that's what we are. We're interested in anything about revolt, disorder, chaos and activity that appears to have no meaning." Jim Morrison |