Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5471
Next month in: 03:44:39
Server time: 12:15:20, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): AethanKal | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Constitutional Amendment of 3392

Details

Submitted by[?]: Chann National Party (CNP)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 3394

Description[?]:

Change seats of Senate to 100 to increase RP.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date03:43:25, November 08, 2012 CET
FromUnited Labor Party of Solentia
ToDebating the Constitutional Amendment of 3392
Message...WHAT? NO!

Date08:54:32, November 08, 2012 CET
FromGrand Liberal Party
ToDebating the Constitutional Amendment of 3392
MessageOOC

Very much the right thing to do. My Senators shall be named by state after the election

Date03:20:01, November 11, 2012 CET
FromChann National Party (CNP)
ToDebating the Constitutional Amendment of 3392
MessageOOC: ULP, this isn't changing the representation really. Representation will remain the same, this is merely for RP sakes.

Date04:47:20, November 11, 2012 CET
FromUnited Labor Party of Solentia
ToDebating the Constitutional Amendment of 3392
MessageNo.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 143

no
   

Total Seats: 147

abstain
   

Total Seats: 135


Random fact: Real-life quotations may be used in Particracy, but the real-life speaker or author should always be referenced in an OOC (out-of-character) note alongside the quotation.

Random quote: "A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven." - Jean Chretien (describing the level of proof about weapons of mass destruction that Canada required to join the Iraq War)

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 52