We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Proposta di Riforma Istituzionale (P.d.l. 4/3393 MVAP)
Details
Submitted by[?]: MoVimento della Gente (MVG)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 3394
Description[?]:
| Introduzione a un sistema presidenzialista e federalista - Romina Podda |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The constitutional right and responsibility to propose a cabinet to the legislature.
Old value:: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Current: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Proposed: Only the Head of State can propose a cabinet coalition.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The total number of seats in the legislative assembly. Should be between 75 and 750.
Old value:: 499
Current: 450
Proposed: 100
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The method used to determine the number of seats each region receives in the national legislature.
Old value:: A proportional algorithm that gives a very small advantage to larger regions.
Current: Equal representation, regardless of region population.
Proposed: Equal representation, regardless of region population.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The appointment of mayors.
Old value:: Citizens elect their mayor directly in a local election.
Current: Citizens elect their mayor directly in a local election.
Proposed: Local governments determine the method of appointment.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change Structure of the executive branch.
Old value:: The Head of State and Head of Government are two separate officials.
Current: The Head of State and Head of Government are two separate officials.
Proposed: The Head of State is also Head of Government.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:21:20, November 10, 2012 CET | From | MoVimento della Gente (MVG) | To | Debating the Proposta di Riforma Istituzionale (P.d.l. 4/3393 MVAP) |
| Message | Chiedo a tutti i partiti la massima collaborazione: in un momento di così difficoltosa frammentazione tutti dobbiamo renderci conto che è ora di cambiare qualcosa che vada oltre una presentazione simbolica delle coalizione pre-elettorali. Chiedo dunque di raggiungere un compromesso per una seria riforma istituzionale: dite cosa va, cosa è accettabile, cosa proprio non va. |
| Date | 13:47:34, November 10, 2012 CET | From | Terra e Popolo | To | Debating the Proposta di Riforma Istituzionale (P.d.l. 4/3393 MVAP) |
| Message | Assolutamente contrari. |
| Date | 12:45:22, November 11, 2012 CET | From | Popolari per l'Istalia - U.o.L. | To | Debating the Proposta di Riforma Istituzionale (P.d.l. 4/3393 MVAP) |
| Message | Prima vincete le elezioni, poi formate un governo e quindi potrete presentare tali riforme. In ogni caso contrari, soprattutto agli ultimi tre. |
| Date | 16:22:45, November 11, 2012 CET | From | MoVimento della Gente (MVG) | To | Debating the Proposta di Riforma Istituzionale (P.d.l. 4/3393 MVAP) |
| Message | Quanta arroganza. Non mi pare che il CDN abbia la maggioranza assoluta. Forse mi sbaglio... O forse semplicemente è il CDN ad essere sicuro di un assoluto servilismo della coalizione al suo volere. Le riforme, cari camerati del CDN, c'è libertà di proporle. E siccome voi che siete al governo preferite stagnare nel conservatorismo e nella svendita della nazione, noi cerchiamo di risvegliare le coscienze. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 87 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 340 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 72 |
| Random fact: In cases where players have failed to clearly and accurately reference their nation's RP laws in the "Bills under debate" section, Moderation will rule them invalid if a challenge is made to their validity. |
| Random quote: "The answer to global warming is in the abolition of private property and production for human need. A socialist world would place an enormous priority on alternative energy sources. This is what ecologically-minded socialists have been exploring for quite some time now." - Louis Proyect |