Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5461
Next month in: 02:54:16
Server time: 01:05:43, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): albaniansunited | hexaus18 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Foreign Policy Simplification Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: United Republics Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 3398

Description[?]:

a

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:36:13, November 17, 2012 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Foreign Policy Simplification Act
MessageThe United Nations of Terra is obsolete. Lodamun is a member of the far more popular League of Terran Nations http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreaty.php?treatyid=1895

NATO is similarly obsolete. Its members are random, far away, and share no common foreign policy interests. Lodamun is a cornerstone in the Northern Seleya Alliance http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreaty.php?treatyid=1998 The NSA actually makes sense and should be the focus of our foreign policy.

Date21:08:09, November 17, 2012 CET
FromIndependent Party
ToDebating the Foreign Policy Simplification Act
MessageDoes the URP think foreign policy is a popularity contest?

NATO is not obsolete and we have no idea where the URP gets these facts that the members share "no common foreign policy interests." Have the URP members ever read the NATO charter?

We will not support withdrawing from either treaty.

Date21:32:58, November 17, 2012 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Foreign Policy Simplification Act
MessageThe URP secured a vote in Baltisia for it to join the NSA. If passed, it will provide more prosperity and stability than a thousand NATOs. I know the Independents want to bloat the military budget so it can engage in reckless international escapades, but let's focus on alliances that make sense for our people. I urge all parties to look at the map. One alliance makes sense and the other does not.

Date02:51:28, November 18, 2012 CET
FromIndependent Party
ToDebating the Foreign Policy Simplification Act
MessageThe map means nothing, the ideals behind the organizations do. NATO has been around for centuries and the member nations have never been attacked. You do the math. We don't oppose the NSA, we simply know that NATO is far more effective,

Date06:40:05, November 18, 2012 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Foreign Policy Simplification Act
MessageI have a rock that keeps tigers away.

Date08:43:02, November 18, 2012 CET
FromNew Democratic Party
ToDebating the Foreign Policy Simplification Act
MessageI strongly support withdraw from the Northern Area Treaty Organization (NATO).
And a some times ago I also thinking about withdrawal from United Nations of Terra, because we are members of League of Terran Nations. Why we have to be at both of them? Is useless.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 125

no
 

Total Seats: 111

abstain
   

Total Seats: 89


Random fact: After 3 days (72 hours) your account will be inactivated by Moderation. If you want to be reactivated you can request reactivation located here: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4360

Random quote: "The Lord is a man of war" - Exodus 15:3

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 52