We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of December 3403
Details
Submitted by[?]: Baracuda Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 3404
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the 
Baracuda Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Party for Environmental Responsibility
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Old Whig Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Mitten Partiet
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Forward Hutori Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Baracuda Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Baracuda Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Baracuda Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Baracuda Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Baracuda Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Baracuda Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Workers' Popular Alliance
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Socialist Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:19:04, December 01, 2012 CET | From | Workers' Popular Alliance | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 3403 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, This proposal is rather ridiculous. Firstly, the Baracuda Party has zero seats in Parliament, thus I would recommend they put this proposal foward AFTER their first election. Secondly, we have no idea where the BP stands on any issues. I think it be no surprise that we vote against this proposal. |
| Date | 14:04:00, December 01, 2012 CET | From | Old Whig Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 3403 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, This is one of the rare occasions on which both the Old Whig Party and the WPA can agree. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 220 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 171 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "Any dictator would admire the uniformity and obedience of the US media." - Noam Chomsky |