We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Far More Sweepingly Hygienic Reforms Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Land and Peoples' Choice Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 3404
Description[?]:
Like the EGP proposal... but smelling less of weed. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Food safety policy.
Old value:: The government introduces, and actively enforces, food standards provisions.
Current: The government introduces, and actively enforces, food standards provisions.
Proposed: Local governments determine food safety standards.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards the use of land mines by the army.
Old value:: The use of land mines is allowed but restricted.
Current: The use of land mines is allowed.
Proposed: The use of land mines is allowed.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The legality of dueling.
Old value:: Dueling is illegal.
Current: Dueling is legal and unregulated.
Proposed: This matter is left for the local governments to decide upon.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to the production of pornography.
Old value:: The production of pornography is treated as any other business.
Current: The production of pornography is treated as any other business.
Proposed: Local governments establish policies on the production of pornography.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards smoking.
Old value:: Smoking is legal everywhere, at the discretion of the property owner. However, service/employer property owners that allow smoking must provide a separate non-smoking section.
Current: Smoking is legal outdoors and in private homes and clubs, but illegal indoors in all places of employment.
Proposed: Smoking regulations are to be determined by local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 17:53:20, December 01, 2012 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Far More Sweepingly Hygienic Reforms Act |
Message | Amusing description. This will have our somewhat reluctant support. |
Date | 17:53:49, December 01, 2012 CET | From | Land and Peoples' Choice Party | To | Debating the Far More Sweepingly Hygienic Reforms Act |
Message | Now that I have completed the proposal, do you still support it? |
Date | 17:55:32, December 01, 2012 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Far More Sweepingly Hygienic Reforms Act |
Message | Yes, I actually was in the closest about supporting the right to duel anyway. |
Date | 17:58:40, December 01, 2012 CET | From | Land and Peoples' Choice Party | To | Debating the Far More Sweepingly Hygienic Reforms Act |
Message | I thought the land mines would be a turnoff for you EGP nancies. |
Date | 18:04:33, December 01, 2012 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Far More Sweepingly Hygienic Reforms Act |
Message | It is but we still support the overall bill. We aren't at war so it isn't high priority. |
Date | 18:07:24, December 01, 2012 CET | From | Land and Peoples' Choice Party | To | Debating the Far More Sweepingly Hygienic Reforms Act |
Message | We COULD be at war, you know. We could make it happen, I think. The whole friendship treaty thing... it's really old news. Besides, you could correct some of your milquetoast public image by going to war with a nation that hasn't provoked us. |
Date | 18:09:41, December 01, 2012 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Far More Sweepingly Hygienic Reforms Act |
Message | Are you suggesting a totally unprovoked war? And you call us murderers? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes |
Total Seats: 258 | ||
no | Total Seats: 43 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Role-play is most enjoyable and successful when there is good communication and friendly relations between all players involved. |
Random quote: "You can't get rid of poverty by giving people money." - P. J. O'Rourke |