We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Right to Divorce Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Independent Capitalist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2154
Description[?]:
People should be allowed to divorce each other. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The legality of divorces (if marriages are recognised).
Old value:: Only divorces that comply with religious doctrine are legal.
Current: Divorces are legal, be it mutual consent, grounded cause or if one partner wants it.
Proposed: Divorces are legal, be it mutual consent, grounded cause or if one partner wants it.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the initiation of divorces (if allowed).
Old value:: Local governments decide who can initiate a divorce.
Current: Either partner may initiate a divorce.
Proposed: Either partner may initiate a divorce.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:05:13, December 10, 2005 CET | From | Social Reform Party | To | Debating the Right to Divorce Act |
Message | For. |
Date | 23:08:23, December 10, 2005 CET | From | Capitalism Now! Party | To | Debating the Right to Divorce Act |
Message | Agreed with 1, but not 2 |
Date | 23:13:37, December 10, 2005 CET | From | Independent Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Right to Divorce Act |
Message | If enough people are against 2, I'll remove it and just pass 1. |
Date | 01:30:21, December 11, 2005 CET | From | Aloria Green Socialist Party | To | Debating the Right to Divorce Act |
Message | For both. |
Date | 02:30:59, December 11, 2005 CET | From | Independent Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Right to Divorce Act |
Message | 290 isn't enough to pass it... |
Date | 02:36:33, December 11, 2005 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Right to Divorce Act |
Message | Agreed with both. Normally, the Movement would be opposed to such legislation. However, this, whilst anti-Devolution, aims to protect the rights of the people of Aloria. |
Date | 04:33:12, December 11, 2005 CET | From | Independent Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Right to Divorce Act |
Message | MLAS, I recommend proposing another devolution bill to balance this bill's anti-devolution effects... |
Date | 05:22:31, December 11, 2005 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Right to Divorce Act |
Message | We shall. |
Date | 07:55:21, December 11, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Right to Divorce Act |
Message | And I've hence voted for the bill proposed by the MLAS. And I'm for both of these terms. |
Date | 16:09:09, December 11, 2005 CET | From | Independent Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Right to Divorce Act |
Message | Well, I made two huge devolutionist bills. Should balance out the effects of article 2 nine times... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 491 | ||||||
no |
Total Seats: 109 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: It is forbidden to impersonate a player or Moderator. |
Random quote: "The superior man is distressed by the limitations of his ability; he is not distressed by the fact that men do not recognize the ability that he has." - Confucius |