We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Marriage Act: December 2153
Details
Submitted by[?]: International Society of Bankers
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2167
Description[?]:
December 2153 <--- That is the month of the year of the century of the millenia. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy toward marriage.
Old value:: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Current: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Proposed: The government does not involve itself in marriage or civil unions.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 07:13:41, December 11, 2005 CET | From | Slaytanic Wehrmacht | To | Debating the Marriage Act: December 2153 |
Message | support #2 |
Date | 18:16:06, December 11, 2005 CET | From | CNT/AFL | To | Debating the Marriage Act: December 2153 |
Message | Support both. |
Date | 18:41:29, December 11, 2005 CET | From | Slaytanic Wehrmacht | To | Debating the Marriage Act: December 2153 |
Message | I'd rather see my bill to pass, because leaving it to local government still includes that those local government may prohibit divorces. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 66 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 23 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 11 |
Random fact: Party candidates for head of state elections are not visible to the public. This means that you cannot see who will run and who will not, which adds another strategic element to the elections. |
Random quote: "Perhaps the fact that we have seen millions voting themselves into complete dependence on a tyrant has made our generation understand that to choose one's government is not necessarily to secure freedom." - Friedrich Hayek |