We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Slaytanic Wehrmacht: Removing Unnecessary Protection
Details
Submitted by[?]: Slaytanic Wehrmacht
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2154
Description[?]:
You know, our citizens own all kinds of guns and stuff, so they don't need to be protected by a police. Our Citizens can protect themselves. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Firefighting services.
Old value:: Fire prevention and management is left to the local governments.
Current: There is a national fire department, funded by the government.
Proposed: The government has no fire management policy.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place, backed up by the military.
Current: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place and the military is not allowed to play any part in it.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the organization of police/law enforcement
Old value:: The operation and funding of the police is left to local governments.
Current: There is a national police department funded by the national government and there are local police departments, funded by local governments.
Proposed: The government does not operate or fund any police.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The weapons used by police forces.
Old value:: Police officers carry standard firearms.
Current: Police officers may only carry standard firearms apart from specially trained firearms units.
Proposed: Police officers may only carry non-lethal weapons.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 19:11:21, December 11, 2005 CET | From | CNT/AFL | To | Debating the Slaytanic Wehrmacht: Removing Unnecessary Protection |
Message | Hmm, support 2 and 4 but oppose 1 and 3. |
Date | 00:04:24, December 12, 2005 CET | From | International Society of Bankers | To | Debating the Slaytanic Wehrmacht: Removing Unnecessary Protection |
Message | support none |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 31 | |||||||
no |
Total Seats: 211 | |||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players using inactive accounts and/or accounts from outside nations may only propose bills and/or contribute to discussions, whether IC (in-character) or OOC (out-of-character) with the general consent of the players in the nation. |
Random quote: "Too bad all the people who know how to run the country are busy driving taxi cabs and cutting hair." - George Burns |