We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Forest Management Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Popular Party of Trigunia
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2154
Description[?]:
We want to make this change because in the actual form it is possible that in some regions have only a local government agency without private companies. With this change the free market is assured in all forests, but the state can control the abuses made in forest harvesting, protecting the nature. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: Local governments may set up forestry agencies. Where they do not, forestry is on a commercial basis.
Current: There is a national agency which owns and manages all forest land.
Proposed: There is a national agency which owns all forests, but subcontracts the work to private companies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 7 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 383 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 119 |
Random fact: The default rule is that role-play events can only be done with the consent of all of the players in the nation or nations concerned, and that if one of the players withdraws consent for the role-play, then the role-play becomes void. However, there are procedures available to overcome the risk of a role-play being brought down like this. These procedures cannot compel players to actively participate in a role-play, but they do oblige them not to stand in the way of them and to recognise their legitimacy under the rules. |
Random quote: "The spirit of democracy is not a mechanical thing to be adjusted by abolition of forms. It requires change of heart." – Mohandas Gandhi |