We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Official Condemnation of the Valruzian and Badaran Governments
Details
Submitted by[?]: 반동주의자당 (Bandongjuuijadang)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 3422
Description[?]:
| Madam Speaker, I sure that the entire house, with the exception of about 22 supposedly honourable members, will join me in condemning the support for terrorist activity and subversion show by the governments of Valruzia and Badara. We propose a motion censuring the disgraceful behaviour of these governments, who openly support and offer aid to the Sons of Jalal and other enemies of the Dranish state. Governor Adolfo Conrado Aníbal Rafael MP First Minister of Valdor |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:21:41, January 06, 2013 CET | From | Grand National Party | To | Debating the Official Condemnation of the Valruzian and Badaran Governments |
| Message | OOC: I doubt you can be Governor, FM and MP at the same time ;-) IC: Madam Speaker, we are appalled and disgusted over the Badaran and Valruzian authorities daring to support an extremist organization that ignores democratic principles and has plunged the Province of Valdor in turmoil, provoking a serious political crisis. We therefore wholeheartedly support this motion. Michelle DuPont MP Member for Ulbrach GNP Foreign Affairs Spokeswoman |
| Date | 00:26:48, January 06, 2013 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Party | To | Debating the Official Condemnation of the Valruzian and Badaran Governments |
| Message | Madam Speaker, we in the Democratic Socialist Party are appalled by the inexcusable behaviour of the Badaran government. We are also gravely concerned by the efforts of the Imperial Libertarian Party of Valruzia to get their government to aid terrorists in Dranland. However, we ough to note that as of yet, Valruzia has not committed itself to supporting the 'Sons of Jalal. We are pleased to report that one Valruzian party is opposed to such a move, and another party is asking questions about whether this would be the right thing to do. Cadfael Maddocks MP (Leader of the DSP) OOC: On the subject of Valruzia, see: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=370178 |
| Date | 01:50:59, January 06, 2013 CET | From | Popular Party | To | Debating the Official Condemnation of the Valruzian and Badaran Governments |
| Message | OOC: My statement is on that link. |
| Date | 08:13:16, January 06, 2013 CET | From | Conservative National Party | To | Debating the Official Condemnation of the Valruzian and Badaran Governments |
| Message | OOC: Yeah, all government positions are separate. The only exception is that you can be a legislator and a minister at the same time - and that can only happen at the same level of government (ie. a national MP can't be a provincial minister) |
| Date | 13:55:15, January 06, 2013 CET | From |  Revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Official Condemnation of the Valruzian and Badaran Governments |
| Message | This condemnation is highly unfair as the Government of Valruzia has voted against the bill offering asylum for Jalalist terrorists( http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=370178&vote=no) We urge all yeah parties to reconsider. Charles Maxian Foreign Minister of Valruzia. |
| Date | 14:29:00, January 06, 2013 CET | From | Socialist Progress & Reform Front | To | Debating the Official Condemnation of the Valruzian and Badaran Governments |
| Message | Like the Revolutionary Party expressed, we urge all yeah parties to reconsider.. The bill will never be approved in Valruzian Parliament.... |
| Date | 16:33:02, January 06, 2013 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Party | To | Debating the Official Condemnation of the Valruzian and Badaran Governments |
| Message | Madam Speaker,this request from our Valruzian guests could not be more reasonable. Now that the Valruzian position has been clarified, this motion is no longer appropriate. We would, of course, support a revised motion just condemning Badara. Cadfael Maddocks MP (Leader of the DSP) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 19 | ||||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 192 | ||||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 16 |
| Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
| Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights |