We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: DPRP Defense Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Peoples Revolutionary Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 3424
Description[?]:
Official DPRP Defense Act Signed, Gen. Shiro Kisaragi |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of chemical and biological weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Current: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Proposed: The nation can only use chemical or biological weapons on non-civilan areas.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Civil defence is the government's policy on providing shelters to be used in the event of attacks on major cities, mainly nuclear attacks and bombing.
Old value:: The government builds and maintains a network of shelters across the nation.
Current: The government builds and maintains a network of shelters across the nation.
Proposed: No new buildings may be constructed unless they feature provisions for civil defence.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards the use of land mines by the army.
Old value:: The use of land mines is prohibited.
Current: The use of land mines is allowed but restricted.
Proposed: The use of land mines is allowed but restricted.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place and the military is not allowed to play any part in it.
Current: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Proposed: The military acts as a de-facto police force, with powers of arrest.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 03:33:43, January 09, 2013 CET | From | Nationella Royalister | To | Debating the DPRP Defense Act |
Message | Only article 2 is acceptable. And in what nation is the proposer of this bill a general? |
Date | 05:17:05, January 09, 2013 CET | From | Democratic Peoples Revolutionary Party | To | Debating the DPRP Defense Act |
Message | (OOC: Nations ran by a military, or nations that have a party based on a military style ran system. I am of course assuming you are asking said question in OOC?) |
Date | 00:00:40, January 11, 2013 CET | From | Nationella Royalister | To | Debating the DPRP Defense Act |
Message | No, I was not. There is no record of a Telamonese general by that name and if he is not a general here, he should not use that title in these halls. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |
yes | Total Seats: 0 | |
no |
Total Seats: 500 | |
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Real-life quotations may be used in Particracy, but the real-life speaker or author should always be referenced in an OOC (out-of-character) note alongside the quotation. |
Random quote: "You know what's interesting about Washington? It's the kind of place where second-guessing has become second nature." - George W. Bush |