We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: We are Laissez Faire! Let us prove it!
Details
Submitted by[?]: Freedom Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2155
Description[?]:
| Here we go then |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on industry and subsidies to industrial operations.
Old value:: The government does not intervene in the market nor provide any form of subsidies/relief to industries.
Current: Certain industries are owned by the state, all others are under private ownership.
Proposed: Certain industries are owned by the state, all others are under private ownership.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:57:27, December 12, 2005 CET | From |  RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the We are Laissez Faire! Let us prove it! |
| Message | Erm, you're voting against your own bills... If you wanted to prove you're pro-laissez-faire, you could have just asked me to propose some more pro-regulation bills. :-S |
| Date | 12:22:26, December 12, 2005 CET | From | Radical Freedom Party | To | Debating the We are Laissez Faire! Let us prove it! |
| Message | OOC: this really is raping the system. What happened to the nice and roleplaying Rutania that I went over to join? :( |
| Date | 14:03:39, December 12, 2005 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the We are Laissez Faire! Let us prove it! |
| Message | OOC: Sorry Knoot but im pissed off i went to regulator leaning after opposing all those anti free market RSDP bills. Ganny, please propose some regulation bills, thanks |
| Date | 22:01:19, December 12, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the We are Laissez Faire! Let us prove it! |
| Message | OOC: You're the mod, just fiddle with your stats a bit ;) |
| Date | 23:19:05, December 12, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Imperialist Party | To | Debating the We are Laissez Faire! Let us prove it! |
| Message | OOC: lol. I think it would be better if you got to tick which options you support and have your positions based off *that* and not votes, and then have your *consistency* based on comparing the options ticked to actual votes. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 181 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 418 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play". |
| Random quote: "Presidency, n. The greased pig in the field game of American politics." - Ambrose Bierce |