We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Adultery
Details
Submitted by[?]: Logisk Synspunkt
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 3450
Description[?]:
Adultery should be illegal. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to adultery.
Old value:: Adultery is legal.
Current: Adultery is legal.
Proposed: Adultery is illegal, but not prosecuted.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 01:01:15, March 03, 2013 CET | From | Indigoblå Liga | To | Debating the Adultery |
Message | This is a blatant intrusion of the government into the private lives of citizens. The federal government has no jurisdiction over this matter much less to make it a capital offence and punish adultery with the death sentence! |
Date | 02:35:37, March 03, 2013 CET | From | Indigoblå Liga | To | Debating the Adultery |
Message | We are willing to vote this bill now that it has been amended to omit the death penalty. |
Date | 12:40:31, March 03, 2013 CET | From | De venstregrønne | To | Debating the Adultery |
Message | De venstregrønne is shocked that anyone in our country would even contemplate the death penalty for adultery. The position of Logisk Synspunkt seems to be far from logical in this issue but rather driven by an extreme puritanical and fascist approach to morality. Even the amended bill will not get our support and De venstregrønne believes that adultery, while perhaps morally objectionable, is something that the state cannot and should not involve itself in. |
Date | 18:40:14, March 03, 2013 CET | From | Logisk Synspunkt | To | Debating the Adultery |
Message | I CLICKED THE WRONG BUTTON. |
Date | 18:47:30, March 03, 2013 CET | From | De venstregrønne | To | Debating the Adultery |
Message | OOC: Okay, I did think it was rather than extreme and odd suggestion. |
Date | 18:47:45, March 03, 2013 CET | From | De venstregrønne | To | Debating the Adultery |
Message | 'rather an extreme' |
Date | 00:52:51, March 04, 2013 CET | From | Indigoblå Liga | To | Debating the Adultery |
Message | After much debating, we have decided to vote no on this bill on the grounds that the federal government cannot and should not regulate the private affairs of citizens. This matter should remain between the spouses involved. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 65 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 141 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 44 |
Random fact: Your user name is not your party name. Choose a concise and easy to remember user name. You can change your party name at any point in time later in the game. |
Random quote: "Even when laws have been written down, they ought not always to remain unaltered." - Aristotle |