Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5474
Next month in: 00:01:02
Server time: 03:58:57, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): dnobb | Kubrick2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Adultery

Details

Submitted by[?]: Logisk Synspunkt

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 3450

Description[?]:

Adultery should be illegal.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:01:15, March 03, 2013 CET
FromIndigoblå Liga
ToDebating the Adultery
MessageThis is a blatant intrusion of the government into the private lives of citizens. The federal government has no jurisdiction over this matter much less to make it a capital offence and punish adultery with the death sentence!

Date02:35:37, March 03, 2013 CET
FromIndigoblå Liga
ToDebating the Adultery
MessageWe are willing to vote this bill now that it has been amended to omit the death penalty.

Date12:40:31, March 03, 2013 CET
FromDe venstregrønne
ToDebating the Adultery
MessageDe venstregrønne is shocked that anyone in our country would even contemplate the death penalty for adultery. The position of Logisk Synspunkt seems to be far from logical in this issue but rather driven by an extreme puritanical and fascist approach to morality. Even the amended bill will not get our support and De venstregrønne believes that adultery, while perhaps morally objectionable, is something that the state cannot and should not involve itself in.

Date18:40:14, March 03, 2013 CET
FromLogisk Synspunkt
ToDebating the Adultery
MessageI CLICKED THE WRONG BUTTON.

Date18:47:30, March 03, 2013 CET
FromDe venstregrønne
ToDebating the Adultery
MessageOOC: Okay, I did think it was rather than extreme and odd suggestion.

Date18:47:45, March 03, 2013 CET
FromDe venstregrønne
ToDebating the Adultery
Message'rather an extreme'

Date00:52:51, March 04, 2013 CET
FromIndigoblå Liga
ToDebating the Adultery
MessageAfter much debating, we have decided to vote no on this bill on the grounds that the federal government cannot and should not regulate the private affairs of citizens. This matter should remain between the spouses involved.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 65

no
    

Total Seats: 141

abstain
 

Total Seats: 44


Random fact: Your user name is not your party name. Choose a concise and easy to remember user name. You can change your party name at any point in time later in the game.

Random quote: "Even when laws have been written down, they ought not always to remain unaltered." - Aristotle

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 58