We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: United Blobs Cabinet Proposal of February 2050
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Blobs
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2051
Description[?]:
Following the latest elections we propose a new cabinet. |
Proposals
Article 1
As per the Constitution, the Hobratsis Respublikis Prezidenti (President of the Hobrazian Republic) chairs the cabinet.
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the We Say So! Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the United Blobs
Article 4
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the People's Party of Oppressive Liberation
Article 5
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the United Blobs
Article 6
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the United Blobs
Article 7
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the We Say So! Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the People's Party of Oppressive Liberation
Article 9
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the People's Party of Oppressive Liberation
Article 10
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the We Say So! Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 20:57:22, May 10, 2005 CET | From | United Blobs | To | Debating the United Blobs Cabinet Proposal of February 2050 |
Message | @PPOL and WSS - Please reply with a yes so we can make this proposal reality ASAP. |
Date | 00:56:03, May 11, 2005 CET | From | Left Communist Party | To | Debating the United Blobs Cabinet Proposal of February 2050 |
Message | No. |
Date | 00:56:51, May 11, 2005 CET | From | Socialist Party | To | Debating the United Blobs Cabinet Proposal of February 2050 |
Message | If I was PPOL I would vote this down, since the UB have less seats in parliament yet more ministers among which the prime minister. I'll be voting it down anyway. |
Date | 01:28:10, May 11, 2005 CET | From | National Imperial Hobrazian Front | To | Debating the United Blobs Cabinet Proposal of February 2050 |
Message | If I were PPOL or WSS, I would also vote this down. They, with the support of the left-leaning parties, could form their own coalition. They could take the top seats and leave some of the less important cabinet spots to the socialist and center-left parties. |
Date | 01:36:32, May 11, 2005 CET | From | People's Party of Oppressive Liberation | To | Debating the United Blobs Cabinet Proposal of February 2050 |
Message | We support. |
Date | 02:43:13, May 11, 2005 CET | From | National Imperial Hobrazian Front | To | Debating the United Blobs Cabinet Proposal of February 2050 |
Message | We'll offer a nice alternative. |
Date | 08:27:47, May 11, 2005 CET | From | United Blobs | To | Debating the United Blobs Cabinet Proposal of February 2050 |
Message | @Socialists - We don't have a Prime Minister; we have a Chancellor who is actually from the WSS. Also does three seats matter that much in deciding the biggest party? @Christian Socialists - Aren't most parties hear left-leaning? I've yet to see any part show themselves as really right wing (though it would be more interesting if there were some). @All parties who think I'm being unfair - The point of a cabinet is to get a majority using the least parties possibly so that there is less chance of splits in it. I've chosen the three parties with similar numbers of seats and tried to give them similar numbers of posts - but 10/3 is not an integer so I've had to be slightly unfair. |
Date | 12:54:28, May 11, 2005 CET | From | We Say So! Party | To | Debating the United Blobs Cabinet Proposal of February 2050 |
Message | We accept |
Date | 20:31:39, May 11, 2005 CET | From | Socialist Party | To | Debating the United Blobs Cabinet Proposal of February 2050 |
Message | @ UB I ment the head of gouvernor. What I should think the most important minister. Allright maybe a perfect rounded diivision is not possible but still it is the second time in a row that YOU propose a cabinet and the proposal is "rounded down" in your favor... |
Date | 20:38:16, May 11, 2005 CET | From | Socialist Party | To | Debating the United Blobs Cabinet Proposal of February 2050 |
Message | Most parties here are left-leaning, I am perhaps the most left of all. PPOL has a very repressive view and the Equalist Utopia Party has some very liberal and market-oriented stances... Only the Christian Socialist party I do not know yet or he is more rightwing than me or not, I also don't know it from the Hobrazia Greens but greens usually are more rightwing than me. And yes since some of you want to privatize the agriculture and want people to work until they're 70 before they can get any state pension (pension from social security) I do believe some of you 'leftwing' parties van be very to the right regularly. |
Date | 20:49:09, May 11, 2005 CET | From | United Blobs | To | Debating the United Blobs Cabinet Proposal of February 2050 |
Message | There's nothing wrong with my proposing of a cabinet before anyone else and it being accepted by those in it. If they were unhappy with the division they would not have given their support to it. If you get into power than you can make your choices but for now my way seems to be working fine. |
Date | 18:39:57, May 12, 2005 CET | From | Socialist Party | To | Debating the United Blobs Cabinet Proposal of February 2050 |
Message | aye... I said "what I would do if I were PPOL" That doesn't mean I think PPOL should vote it like that... if he does not want to make full use of his seats than it is his thing to decide that. I don't blame you for putting a proposal that gets a majority anyway. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 230 | |||
no | Total Seats: 109 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 61 |
Random fact: Google Translate can help you with those language translations: https://translate.google.com/ |
Random quote: "It is obvious that the laissez-faire ideology represents the interests of big business. For decades, the right-wing has opposed welfare programs and nationalised companies, in favour of big business disguised under 'economic liberty'." - Cecilia Xu, former Gaduri politician |