Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5461
Next month in: 02:06:58
Server time: 17:53:01, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): hexaus18 | hexaus19 | HopesFor | Maarten_saridan | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Administrative reforms

Details

Submitted by[?]: Voluntaryist Society

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 3455

Description[?]:

Standing for a more democratic, participative and equalist system, the Voluntaryist Society proposes the following reforms.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:19:12, March 14, 2013 CET
FromAlgemeyner Manarkistishen Arbeter Bund
ToDebating the Administrative reforms
MessageThis bill has some major problems. Not having multiple citizenships registered will be a major headache, and allowing anyone to claim citizenship would make it harder to integrate immigrants. Identity cards are necessary to enforce age limits, guarantee benefits and also for law enforcement. As far as government salaries, having no salary would mean that only the independent wealthy could sit in the National Assembly (or else MPs would have to work multiple jobs - not good for their constituents). Therefore, we oppose this bill.

Date14:50:31, March 14, 2013 CET
FromVoluntaryist Society
ToDebating the Administrative reforms
MessageThe State should be abolished and that's what we think and will do when we reach the power. Fascists and communists like you are the enemies of freedom.

Date01:37:59, March 15, 2013 CET
FromAlgemeyner Manarkistishen Arbeter Bund
ToDebating the Administrative reforms
MessageIt's silly of you to call us communists, as we have maintained and even deepened the democratic policies in this country. And don't presume to tell us about the abolition of the State, as we have a strong anarcho-syndicalist wing. Why do you think we've devolved so many things to the local level? You would merely replace a democratic state with the rule of the corporations. People will be "free", but that "freedom" will mean nothing when they lack adequate healthcare, housing, social security and public services (utilities, libraries/museums, transit). With stripped down rights for workers, wages will decline drastically as well. Honestly, what about this sounds like an ideal, stateless society? The true anarchist is also in favor of communal ownership.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 40

no
 

Total Seats: 80

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining.

    Random quote: "Corruption greases the wheels of government, and my private jet." - Sung Dae Kim, former Dranian politician

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 74