Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5474
Next month in: 01:09:07
Server time: 14:50:52, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): DanivonX | itsjustgav | johndoe1322 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Environment Protection Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 3459

Description[?]:

Article I: In order to ensure that fishing in Pontesi is coordinated and protective to our fishes, the national government should be responsible for quota establishment. The local government may lack the bigger picture.

Article II and III: The nationalization of Forest Management and ban on private logging is to ensure the protection of our forest which have suffer long from private enterprise.

Article IV: With the responsibility the local government already have, it makes sense to allow the national government which have greater funding and resources to maintain the national park system.

Article V and VI: It's necessary to increase pollution standard. Pontesi had one of the biggest industrial sector in terra and it's our job to ensure that Terra is protected.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:00:15, March 20, 2013 CET
From Aurora Libertatis
ToDebating the Environment Protection Act
MessageWe have mixed feelings with this bill. While we agree that all forests should be owned by the government, we are also in favour of a system where management is subcontracted to private entrepreneurs, to give us the best quality for the lowest price.

We oppose taking powers from the local governments, but we otherwise support tougher environmental regulations. We would also support the banning of non-green cars.

Date04:01:48, March 21, 2013 CET
From Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party)
ToDebating the Environment Protection Act
MessageIf it's possible, we would appreciate an indication on which specific articles you will support and which articles will you not.

Date12:54:25, March 22, 2013 CET
From Aurora Libertatis
ToDebating the Environment Protection Act
MessageSorry for missing that, we'll come up with a bill of our own.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 43

no
  

Total Seats: 362

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: After 3 days (72 hours) your account will be inactivated by Moderation. If you want to be reactivated you can request reactivation located here: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4360

    Random quote: "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it." - Upton Sinclair

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 74