Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5474
Next month in: 01:55:32
Server time: 06:04:27, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): ADM Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Bill concerning religion

Details

Submitted by[?]: Union of Real Politics (URP)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2156

Description[?]:

Changes concerning religion

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:32:31, December 15, 2005 CET
From Solentian Socialist Party
ToDebating the Bill concerning religion
MessageOur party may be willing to support this (Article 3 especially), although we would like to hear the views of others.

We also have concerns about Article 1. Didn't the United Centrists post something similar to this recently, or was it the CFAP? In any case, as the SSP believes it commented there, we would support either person-to-person approval of missionaries, or POSSIBLY a total ban. However, as it stands, Article 1 seems far more liberal than the current policy! (Or have we misread it?)

Date03:34:29, December 15, 2005 CET
From Solentian Socialist Party
ToDebating the Bill concerning religion
MessageWe may have supported this, had our friends in the UC, CFAP, SIP etc. had time to contribute to this discussion.

That said, we have also decided that Article 2 is far too restrictive on the right to freedom of expression and of religion (remember however that it was the SSP that introduced the current policy in the first place, to separate church and state). We are also still undecided on Article 3. These proposals are far too broad to approve in one fell step.

We are, however, willing to support the original CFAP proposal ("Spreading of Religion Reforms"), should they choose to accept the UC/SSP suggestions and modify the proposal so as to necessitate person-to-person approval of foreign missionaries.

Date05:59:01, December 15, 2005 CET
From Solentian Imperialist Party
ToDebating the Bill concerning religion
MessageWe do not believe that total secularism in all aspects of a society is either necessary or proper. Religion still has some place in society, if not in politics. We are voting AGAINST this bill.

Date10:25:32, December 15, 2005 CET
From Communist Fascist And Anarchial Party
ToDebating the Bill concerning religion
Messagewe will support to kkeep our religious ideology at the secular state, but in future please allow 24 hours for debate, due to the different time zones....

Date02:11:22, December 16, 2005 CET
From Solentian Socialist Party
ToDebating the Bill concerning religion
MessageWe concur with the Imperialists.

CFAP - as we mentioned previously, if you would care to propose your religious reform bill on its own, we may reconsider our vote on this policy area.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 114

no
   

Total Seats: 411

abstain
   

Total Seats: 175


Random fact: Your user name is not your party name. Choose a concise and easy to remember user name. You can change your party name at any point in time later in the game.

Random quote: "The people who vote decide nothing. The people who count the vote decide everything." - Joseph Stalin

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 66