Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5471
Next month in: 03:57:21
Server time: 08:02:38, April 18, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): AethanKal | Xalvas | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: CONSTITUNIONAL REFORMS

Details

Submitted by[?]: Republican Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 3480

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:39:15, May 03, 2013 CET
From Conservative Party of Ikradon
ToDebating the CONSTITUNIONAL REFORMS
MessageWhile the proposed titles are incredibly bland they would be a lot more neutral than the current ones.

Date19:19:58, May 03, 2013 CET
From Democratic Communist Party (DCP) (LL)
ToDebating the CONSTITUNIONAL REFORMS
MessageI feel like a hypocrite for opposing this, but I've never like "prime minister" and "parliament" for some reason.

Date20:02:52, May 03, 2013 CET
From Conservative Party of Ikradon
ToDebating the CONSTITUNIONAL REFORMS
MessageThey are bland.
We're only supporting them based on their neutrality.

Minister of Government is simple and for some reason is a name no country uses for the position of head of government, maybe that could be an alternative?
There are more unique alternatives to 'Parliament' too, though 'President' is generally the best name for head of state.

Date21:10:17, May 03, 2013 CET
From Democratic Communist Party (DCP) (LL)
ToDebating the CONSTITUNIONAL REFORMS
MessageYeah I like President, maybe congress or national assembly would be better. Senate sounds nice.

Date22:12:14, May 03, 2013 CET
From Green-Left Communalist Collective
ToDebating the CONSTITUNIONAL REFORMS
MessageThe war on the worker has begun. The bourgeoisie will not succeed!

Date22:31:12, May 03, 2013 CET
From Green-Left Communalist Collective
ToDebating the CONSTITUNIONAL REFORMS
MessageThe CPI has no respect for tradition it seems. Radical constitutional re-branding, very conservative.

Date08:26:22, May 04, 2013 CET
From Democratic Communist Party (DCP) (LL)
ToDebating the CONSTITUNIONAL REFORMS
MessageActually, APS, I just want to say, I have in the past proposed similar reforms in a re-branding effort. I succeeded eventually in changing the flag. My effort was to distance the country from what many could think looks like to soviet union. (General Secretary, Presidium) And for the fact that some of the names make no sense. General Secretary should be if anything HoG, and the presidium should be renamed just due to the fact that historically presidium has to do with an executive branch, or in the case of the USSR, the up echelons of the Communist Party. So, while I am sure the NDP is coming from a different place, I am not entirely opposed to the effort.

Date08:27:46, May 04, 2013 CET
From Democratic Communist Party (DCP) (LL)
ToDebating the CONSTITUNIONAL REFORMS
MessageI would also move that we change the official title of government to the "People's Democratic Republic of Ikradon"

Date08:28:33, May 04, 2013 CET
From Democratic Communist Party (DCP) (LL)
ToDebating the CONSTITUNIONAL REFORMS
MessageThis has more to do with that fact that, up until the CPI and NDP showed up, we were on the verge of being a post socialist utopia.

Date12:09:18, May 04, 2013 CET
From Conservative Party of Ikradon
ToDebating the CONSTITUNIONAL REFORMS
MessageThe current titles do not make sense.
'General-Secretary' would refer to the head of the largest communist party.
'Presidium', I believe, is something we don't have. We just have the 'Chairman of the Presidium', but there is no 'Presidium' to preside over. Or, if there is, I have never heard it be mentioned, nor do I know who's actually a member of the 'Presidium'.

Date13:22:53, May 04, 2013 CET
From Green-Left Communalist Collective
ToDebating the CONSTITUNIONAL REFORMS
MessageFair enough, re-branding the titles of our constitutional branches to sound less soviet, but 'Parliament' is unacceptable. Prime Minister and President are not only bland, but have connotations of aristocracy.

Date13:23:40, May 04, 2013 CET
From Green-Left Communalist Collective
ToDebating the CONSTITUNIONAL REFORMS
MessageWe will open a debate for the more liberal-conservative parties to air their views as well as the more egalitarian, emancipatory-socialist movements to propose ideas.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 519

no
   

Total Seats: 211

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: RP laws follow the same passing rules as in-game variable laws. Laws that are not of a constitutional nature require a simple majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. Laws that are of a constitutional nature require a 2/3 majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. RP laws may be abolished a simple majority vote this applies to ANY RP law.

Random quote: "Global warming, at least the modern nightmare vision, is a myth. I am sure of it and so are a growing number of scientists. But what is really worrying is that the world's politicians and policy makers are not." - David Bellamy

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 64