We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Likatonian Treaty Proposal - Ratification of the Barmenistan Free Trade Agreement
Details
Submitted by[?]: Progressive Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2157
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the <a href="viewtreaty.php?treatyid=156">Barmenistan Free Trade Agreement</a>. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Barmenistan Free Trade Agreement.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 04:57:09, December 16, 2005 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Likatonian Treaty Proposal - Ratification of the Barmenistan Free Trade Agreement |
| Message | The AAS thanks the Progressive Party for bringing this matetr before the Senate. We oppose, as usual, because we do not wish to prostitute our sovereignty. |
| Date | 06:08:34, December 16, 2005 CET | From | Front for State Prosperity | To | Debating the Likatonian Treaty Proposal - Ratification of the Barmenistan Free Trade Agreement |
| Message | The PCP agrees, as usual, because we see economic prosperity as a goal superior to national sovereignty. |
| Date | 14:44:58, December 16, 2005 CET | From | AM Radical Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Likatonian Treaty Proposal - Ratification of the Barmenistan Free Trade Agreement |
| Message | The RLP opposes the treaty because without it, we can have both economic prosperity and national soverignity. |
| Date | 21:56:41, December 16, 2005 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Likatonian Treaty Proposal - Ratification of the Barmenistan Free Trade Agreement |
| Message | Curious... this may be the first time that the PCP has actually admitted that they consider our nation's sovereignty as less important than potential financial reward.... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 177 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 323 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
| Random quote: "No man has ever been born a Negro hater, a Jew hater, or any other kind of hater. Nature refuses to be involved in such suicidal practices." - Harry Bridges |