We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: An Act to Force the Deinstitutionalization of the One-Party System
Details
Submitted by[?]: States' Rights Democratic Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill requests an early election. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline. Elections will be held immediately if the bill passes.
Voting deadline: November 3482
Description[?]:
The States' Rights Democratic Party calls upon the respectable leadership of Sekowo, who control all aspects of the state, to give the people the mighty powers of choice. We request, therefore, that the legislature be dissolved and allow the good people of Sekowo to elect new men unto the legislature. |
Proposals
Article 1
Arrange early elections as soon as this bill passes.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 20:42:34, May 08, 2013 CET | From | States' Rights Democratic Party | To | Debating the An Act to Force the Deinstitutionalization of the One-Party System |
Message | A new party has come to pass, and it is time for us to vie for representation,. Sekowo has been a one-party state, and we, the Dixiecrats, can not wait to get our metaphorical skin into the game. We humbly call the ruling authorities to act on the principles of this republic and give us a rip-roaring, fair change to shape the future of our great nation! |
Date | 05:27:10, May 09, 2013 CET | From | States' Rights Democratic Party | To | Debating the An Act to Force the Deinstitutionalization of the One-Party System |
Message | Why would you vote against this? Are you SCARED of me, Mister Dictator? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |
yes | Total Seats: 0 | |
no |
Total Seats: 700 | |
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
Random quote: "A Bill of Rights that means what the majority wants it to mean is worthless." - Antonin Scalia |