We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Trade and Defence Entente
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal-Progressive Union
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2158
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the <a href="viewtreaty.php?treatyid=161">Trade and Defence Entente</a>. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Trade and Defence Entente.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 04:43:53, December 17, 2005 CET | From |  Liberal-Progressive Union | To | Debating the Ratification of the Trade and Defence Entente |
| Message | It's a little late, but here it is. |
| Date | 02:19:07, December 19, 2005 CET | From | Liberal-Progressive Union | To | Debating the Ratification of the Trade and Defence Entente |
| Message | HPP, I am a little suprised that you would not support this considering your pro-military stance. |
| Date | 12:11:39, December 19, 2005 CET | From | Hobrazian Peoples Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Trade and Defence Entente |
| Message | This is because the HPP believe in isolation. |
| Date | 14:46:23, December 19, 2005 CET | From | Liberal-Progressive Union | To | Debating the Ratification of the Trade and Defence Entente |
| Message | My apologies. |
| Date | 17:11:15, December 19, 2005 CET | From | Hobrazian Peoples Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Trade and Defence Entente |
| Message | it was nothing. :-) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 283 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 117 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy allows you to establish an unelected head of state like a monarch or a president-for-life, but doing this is a bit of a process. First elect a candidate with the name "." to the Head of State position. Then change your law on the "Structure of the executive branch" to "The head of state is hereditary and symbolic; the head of government chairs the cabinet" and change the "formal title of the head of state" to how you want the new head of state's title and name to appear (eg. King Percy XVI). |
| Random quote: "In America today, you can murder land for private profit. You can leave the corpse for all to see, and nobody calls the cops." - Paul Brooks |