We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Protect the Women Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Capitalist Working Families
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 3498
Description[?]:
This is simple and straight-forward: it allows the Rutanian military to bar women from serving in combat positions in the unfortunate case of a war. Why??? Is this bill sexist?! Of course not. However, in the unfortunate event of war, society should seek and PRESERVE the *women* b/c they are the ONLY ones of our species who can get pregnant and bear children thus enable the country to RE-populate itself after it has lost millions of citizens to an act of war or terrorism. Men are and have always been expendable (meaning just one man with 300 million sperm cells can impregnate thousands of women in one shot if society needs RE-populating in the event of a war. All in all, this bill is common-sense. The C-WFP yields the balance of its time. NOTE: This bill has been ENDORSED by the Rutanian Women's Independent Forum & Concerned Women for Rutania organization(s). |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Women in the military.
Old value:: Women serve alongside men.
Current: Women serve alongside men.
Proposed: Women can only serve in non-battle positions.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 18:04:15, June 09, 2013 CET | From | Workers' Solidarity Movement | To | Debating the Protect the Women Act |
Message | Mr Speaker, Is this bill sexist?! Of course it is. It is the definition of sexism. I also think the Hon Gentleman needs a biology lesson. Both males and females are required in the bearing of children, as there are no examples of human parthenogenesis! The idea that "one man...can impregnate thousands of women in one shot" is also clearly incorrect. As a result, the idea that one particular gender must be "preserved" but the other is "expendable" is ludicrous and sexist. Jacob Bentley, Solidarity Spokesperson for Defence |
Date | 21:05:42, June 09, 2013 CET | From | Capitalist Working Families | To | Debating the Protect the Women Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker, "Both males and females are required in the bearing of children, as there are no examples of human parthenogenesis! "--WSM (1) Yes, both males and females are required in the *Reproduction* PROCESS, but according to Biology 101 and human experience, I have NEVER heard or seen a male "bear" any child or get pregnant (some biology lesson). (2) Ask your doctor to confirm our biology: the average man produces 300 million sperm cells per day while the average woman produces only ONE egg cell per MONTH....and then once the woman is pregnant she *cannot* ovulate again until 9 months (nearly a year). (3) In the event of our population being radically decreased from an act of war or terrorism, if there is 1 man to every 5 women ratio, can that 1 man simply impregnate all 5 women in one shot?! However, if women are dying on the battlefield and the ratio is reversed to 1 woman per 5 men, according to physics and biology (ask your doctor), then that means ONLY one of those men are going to impregnate that woman. Therefore, it would be harder as a nation to RE-populate. The C-WFP yields the balance of our time. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 68 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 401 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 86 |
Random fact: Particracy is set in the fictional world of Terra, which mirrors the real world of today and yet is not quite like it. |
Random quote: "The superior man, when resting in safety, does not forget that danger may come. When in a state of security he does not forget the possibility of ruin. When all is orderly, he does not forget that disorder may come. Thus his person is not endangered, and his States and all their clans are preserved." - Confucius |