Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5474
Next month in: 03:12:06
Server time: 16:47:53, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): ADM Drax | JWDL | lulus | VojmatDun | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Protect the Women Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Capitalist Working Families

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 3498

Description[?]:

This is simple and straight-forward: it allows the Rutanian military to bar women from serving in combat positions in the unfortunate case of a war.

Why??? Is this bill sexist?! Of course not. However, in the unfortunate event of war, society should seek and PRESERVE the *women* b/c they are the ONLY ones of our species who can get pregnant and bear children thus enable the country to RE-populate itself after it has lost millions of citizens to an act of war or terrorism. Men are and have always been expendable (meaning just one man with 300 million sperm cells can impregnate thousands of women in one shot if society needs RE-populating in the event of a war.

All in all, this bill is common-sense.

The C-WFP yields the balance of its time.

NOTE: This bill has been ENDORSED by the Rutanian Women's Independent Forum & Concerned Women for Rutania organization(s).

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:04:15, June 09, 2013 CET
FromWorkers' Solidarity Movement
ToDebating the Protect the Women Act
MessageMr Speaker,

Is this bill sexist?! Of course it is. It is the definition of sexism.

I also think the Hon Gentleman needs a biology lesson. Both males and females are required in the bearing of children, as there are no examples of human parthenogenesis! The idea that "one man...can impregnate thousands of women in one shot" is also clearly incorrect. As a result, the idea that one particular gender must be "preserved" but the other is "expendable" is ludicrous and sexist.

Jacob Bentley, Solidarity Spokesperson for Defence

Date21:05:42, June 09, 2013 CET
FromCapitalist Working Families
ToDebating the Protect the Women Act
Message
Mr. Speaker,

"Both males and females are required in the bearing of children, as there are no examples of human parthenogenesis! "--WSM

(1) Yes, both males and females are required in the *Reproduction* PROCESS, but according to Biology 101 and human experience, I have NEVER heard or seen a male "bear" any child or get pregnant (some biology lesson).

(2) Ask your doctor to confirm our biology: the average man produces 300 million sperm cells per day while the average woman produces only ONE egg cell per MONTH....and then once the woman is pregnant she *cannot* ovulate again until 9 months (nearly a year).

(3) In the event of our population being radically decreased from an act of war or terrorism, if there is 1 man to every 5 women ratio, can that 1 man simply impregnate all 5 women in one shot?! However, if women are dying on the battlefield and the ratio is reversed to 1 woman per 5 men, according to physics and biology (ask your doctor), then that means ONLY one of those men are going to impregnate that woman. Therefore, it would be harder as a nation to RE-populate.

The C-WFP yields the balance of our time.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 68

no
     

Total Seats: 401

abstain
 

Total Seats: 86


Random fact: Particracy is set in the fictional world of Terra, which mirrors the real world of today and yet is not quite like it.

Random quote: "The superior man, when resting in safety, does not forget that danger may come. When in a state of security he does not forget the possibility of ruin. When all is orderly, he does not forget that disorder may come. Thus his person is not endangered, and his States and all their clans are preserved." - Confucius

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 48