Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5471
Next month in: 03:30:43
Server time: 04:29:16, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Arusu-Gad | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Abolition of the Empire act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Aurora Libertatis

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 3500

Description[?]:

Dear members of parliament,

It is clear to us that the Ponetsian people have chosen to believe in an inclusive multicultural society and has rejected the parties loyal t the Belknap dynasty, who took power in a bloody coup against a democratic government. We are not here for the sake of revenge though, but for justice, and for serving our people. Though we do not seek to make old wounds clear again, it is clear that the current constitution is undemocratic and lacks legitimacy, and that the Belknap's have no right to rule.

We will therefore propose the disestablishment of the Empire and it's rebirth as the Realm of Pontesi (Kns Pnte in Pntek), as the nation was known as at it's conception. Pontesi will once again be a republic. We will also propose a new motto and a new anthem to reflect the inclusiveness and the multicultural character of our country. We are open for discussion, and everything we are proposing are subject to change, though we are not open to threats or fascist conspiracy theories.

OOC:

The country shall here-forth be known as the "Realm of Pontesi".

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:03:57, June 11, 2013 CET
From Pontesian Imperial Party
ToDebating the Abolition of the Empire act
MessageOOC: SelCrus, to change the name of the nation you'll need 2/3 of the parties to vote in favour. I expect it'll be 50:50 so the name-change wont pass.

Date23:08:17, June 11, 2013 CET
From Pontesian Imperial Party
ToDebating the Abolition of the Empire act
MessageMr. Speaker,

This bill will only re-open old wounds. I would not be surprised if it causes civil war it is so divisive.

The party proposing this bill has no respect for Pontesi, her history, her culture or her people. It is nothing but a fringe minority that will drag our country back to the dark old days.

The Pontesian Imperial Party, with the support of the One Nation Conservative Party, vows to fight for Pontesian interests and will restore the monarchy and the Pontesian democratic system at the earliest opportunity.

While we are naturally disappointed by this proposal it only makes us more determined to reverse it, so we thank Tekàmo Kaisrne for that.

Raynard Polley MP,
Leader of the Party,
Pontesian Imperial Party

Date23:19:28, June 11, 2013 CET
From Aurora Libertatis
ToDebating the Abolition of the Empire act
MessageOOC: We do have a 2/3 majority. You imperialist parties have less than 100 out of 300 seats. It's relatively easy to count with such numbers, isn't it. ;)

Mr. Speaker,

I am afraid that it is the honourable gentleman from the Pontesian Imperial Party that has no respect for Pontesi, her history, her culture or her people. For 69% of them voted explicitly against the Belknap regime, and vowed to create a liberal, tolerant, inclusive and multicultural society. We are the ones fighting for "Ponetsian interests".

I will also fear that some - some fascists - will drag our nation back to the dark old days. For it would not be the first time they started a civil war, or led a violent coup, or a genocide, against a democratic government for the sake of mere symbolism. However, as I am a firm believer in democracy, I will not succumb to such threats. Only the voice of the people matters.

Michael Inetus Sepehr MP (Reformist)
Prime Spokesperson,
Reformist Forum

Date23:20:24, June 11, 2013 CET
From Aurora Libertatis
ToDebating the Abolition of the Empire act
MessageOOC: Sorry, misread what you said. Nope, you just need a 2/3 majority in parliament. You confuse it with the rules on giving away colonies.

Date23:21:12, June 11, 2013 CET
From Aurora Libertatis
ToDebating the Abolition of the Empire act
MessageOOC: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4361

Date23:55:09, June 11, 2013 CET
From Pontesian Imperial Party
ToDebating the Abolition of the Empire act
MessageOOC: Sorry, I got mixed up. I just checked with Zanz on the forum, 2/3 of the parties is for cultural protocols!

Date01:03:20, June 12, 2013 CET
From One Nation Conservative Party
ToDebating the Abolition of the Empire act
MessageMr Speaker, Abolishment isn't a word. The correct terminology for this bill is 'Abolition'.

Date13:00:28, June 12, 2013 CET
From Aurora Libertatis
ToDebating the Abolition of the Empire act
MessageMr Speaker,

I stand corrected. My thanks to the gentleman from the ONCP.

Michael Inetus Sepehr MP (Reformist)
Prime Spokesperson,
Reformist Forum

Date13:01:55, June 12, 2013 CET
From Majatran People's Independence Committee
ToDebating the Abolition of the Empire act
MessageOOC: Will we have two Consuls like in republican Rome or what?

Date13:08:20, June 12, 2013 CET
From Pontesian Imperial Party
ToDebating the Abolition of the Empire act
MessageOOC: No, it looks like we're going to have one dictator: 'The Head of State is also Head of Government.'

Date14:27:31, June 12, 2013 CET
From Aurora Libertatis
ToDebating the Abolition of the Empire act
MessageOOC. Yes, one collected one, like in Dranland. Sepehr is still Grand-Vizier General though.

We need to make a Jelbic (Pnték) translation of the term "Consul". I propose "Knsal".

Date17:02:07, June 12, 2013 CET
FromLibertarian Party
ToDebating the Abolition of the Empire act
MessageMr. Speaker,

The Imperium Selucia is encouraged to see the electorate of Pontesi reject the fascism parties and the criminal family the Belknaps. We are not surprised to see the radical parties of Pontesi already talking about civil war. To these parties, Selucia urges them to embrace change and leave their darkened past behind them.

Yours Respectfully,

Marcus dan Umbria
Minister of Foreign Affairs
Imperium Selucia

Date17:13:22, June 12, 2013 CET
From Pontesian Imperial Party
ToDebating the Abolition of the Empire act
MessageMr. Speaker,

Surprise, surprise. Selucia is to blame. Maybe Pontesi should attempt to colonise Selucia? That is certainly something we will be considering.

Raynard Polley MP

Date10:35:09, June 13, 2013 CET
From Plaid Draneg/Dransk Partij
ToDebating the Abolition of the Empire act
MessageMr Speaker

War-mongering attitude of PIP doesn't surprised me! We are against any war between Selucia and Pontesi. Even if Pntek and Hosians in Pontesi have been through because of Crusader regime. I call our friends in Pontesi ONCP to denounce war-mongering attitude of PIP. We shall end this travesty immediately. Also Belknap family is welcomed in Saridan for residence. Belknapstaad(http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=384056&vote=yes) is available for their residence.

Nrljmai Wrntu MP
Staatspresudentin

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 207

no
  

Total Seats: 93

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Players are expected to behave in a courteous, co-operative manner and make a reasonable effort to act with the consent of all players involved, even where the rules do not make consent strictly necessary. In particular, players have a responsibility to take reasonable care that other players are not misinformed either about the role-play or the Game Rules.

Random quote: "Racism is man's gravest threat to man - the maximum of hatred for a minimum of reason." - Abraham Joshua Heschel

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 92