We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Abolition of Private Inheritance Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hacia Casa
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 3503
Description[?]:
| In order to build a truly fair and cohesive society, private inheritance of property must be abolished. We cannot allow gross inequalities of wealth to cascade down the generations. A person's chances in life should not be determined by accident of birth. Leticia Saldanas MP General Secretary of the Dranish Communist League |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on inheritance
Old value:: There is a regulated inheritance law, but private regulation of inheritance is allowed and not regulated.
Current: There is a regulated inheritance law, private regulation of inheritance is allowed but also regulated.
Proposed: The government inherits everything, private inheritance is outlawed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:23:44, June 18, 2013 CET | From | Grand National Party | To | Debating the Abolition of Private Inheritance Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker, the true reason behind this anti-humanistic, immoral and vicious expropriation agenda is to force everyone into government dependency, so that the communists can more easily proceed to establish their empire of oppression and collectivist fascism, built on the blood and tears of millions of families whose assets would be seized by the blood-thirsty, sub-human communist beasts with whom I unfortunately have to share this chamber. Constance Woodhall MP Member for Magadonia RFR Chairwoman |
| Date | 21:26:59, June 18, 2013 CET | From | Grand National Party | To | Debating the Abolition of Private Inheritance Act |
| Message | Acting Speaker John Bosworth (RFR-Loren): "I urge Mrs Woodhall to withdraw the term 'sub-human beasts' towards fellow MPs." Constance M. Woodhall (RFR-Magadonia): "I yield to the formal requirements of this chamber and withdraw my comment, however I want to assure the people that my opinion on the subjects on the opposite benches hasn't changed at all." |
| Date | 21:37:12, June 18, 2013 CET | From | Radical Liberal Party of Dranland | To | Debating the Abolition of Private Inheritance Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker I am scared from the hypocrasy of Constance Woodhall. One minute she makes backroom deals with commies and next minute she attacks them viciously.Is this a collusion or a rigged game between Saldanas and Woodhall. Siobhan Knutsen Leader of FV |
| Date | 21:56:07, June 18, 2013 CET | From | Grand National Party | To | Debating the Abolition of Private Inheritance Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker, why would I make backroom deals over opposing a policy that stands in opposition to every single value the RFR embraces? Constance Woodhall MP Member for Magadonia RFR Chairwoman |
| Date | 21:56:37, June 18, 2013 CET | From | Grand National Party | To | Debating the Abolition of Private Inheritance Act |
| Message | OOC: she should have added "we would have voted against it in any way." |
| Date | 22:02:19, June 18, 2013 CET | From | Radical Liberal Party of Dranland | To | Debating the Abolition of Private Inheritance Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker To rip of money from your sugar daddy. We all know that you never worked, a day in your life, spend your grandmother's money. That money has to end and I think it ended so you need money, this is why you and Saldanas made a deal with your sugar daddies and union bosses to fill your pockets.Corporatism and Authoritarianism rules RFR. Siobhan Knutsen Leader of FV |
| Date | 22:11:31, June 18, 2013 CET | From | Grand National Party | To | Debating the Abolition of Private Inheritance Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker, I worked very hard as Governor of Magadonia, Minister of Internal Affairs and Member of Parliament to improve the life of the Dranish people, ease their costs of living and grant more freedoms to our citizens. Back to the point - corporatism, apart from communism, is the single most-unlibertarian agenda one could think of. As a woman who sticks to her convictions I could never approve of corporatism, the direct opposite of our pro-market ideals. Constance Woodhall MP Member for Magadonia RFR Chairwoman |
| Date | 22:25:14, June 18, 2013 CET | From | Radical Liberal Party of Dranland | To | Debating the Abolition of Private Inheritance Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker Only thing you've accomplished is build a blood nuclear reactor. Siobhan Knutsen Leader of FV |
| Date | 22:26:15, June 18, 2013 CET | From | Radical Liberal Party of Dranland | To | Debating the Abolition of Private Inheritance Act |
| Message | OOC: I forgot to add ''at least you accept you and your party turned authoritarian, that is a progress.'' |
| Date | 22:36:06, June 18, 2013 CET | From | Grand National Party | To | Debating the Abolition of Private Inheritance Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker, my party is as far away from authoritarianism as one could be, but the FV, in contrast, champions die-hard eco-fascism, aiming to suppress the people in favor of the well-being of trees and bugs. Constance Woodhall MP Member for Magadonia RFR Chairwoman |
| Date | 23:21:14, June 18, 2013 CET | From | Hacia Casa | To | Debating the Abolition of Private Inheritance Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, it is no surprise to see the bourgois parties are all opposed to this Bill. They just want to hold on to their undeserved, unearned and illegitimate privileges. Leticia Saldanas General Secretary of the Dranish Communist League |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 26 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 304 | ||||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 69 |
| Random fact: In order for a Cabinet bill to pass, more than half of the legislature must vote for it and all of the parties included in the proposed Cabinet must support it. If your nation has a Head of State who is also the Head of Government, then the party controlling this character must also vote for the bill, since the Head of Government is also a member of the Cabinet. If any of these requirements are not met, the bill will not pass. |
| Random quote: "Isn't it about time that the US government stop supporting dictatorships and avaricious oligarchies with our tax monies, munitions, and diplomacy?" - Ralph Nader |