We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Revoking Recognition of Mordusian Neutrality
Details
Submitted by[?]: Drania Cívica 🏴 시민당
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 3508
Description[?]:
| Mr. Speaker, It has come to our attention that the Federal Republic of Mordusia has taken actions in the Third Great Majatran War which have violated their long held standards of neutrality. The Mordusians supplied considerable naval support, including the leasing of an aircraft carrier, to the Zardic military. Additionally, about 10,000 lbs of supplies was provided to Zardugal. The Republic of Dranland has no position in the Third Great Majatran War and we do not seek any involvement in the conflict. However, we are signatories of the Mordusian Neutrality Pact, and that agreement has been violated by the Federal Republic of Mordusia. Link: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=383137 In the future, if Mordusia returns to its historically held stance of neutrality we will consider returning our signature to the Mordusian Neutrality Pact. But for now, we cannot be expected to recognize an invalid declaration of neutrality. Sun Tae-gun Minister of Foreign Affairs |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the Mordusian Neutrality Pact.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:32:11, June 29, 2013 CET | From | Grand National Party | To | Debating the Revoking Recognition of Mordusian Neutrality |
| Message | Mr Speaker, we consider this an adequate reaction to the violation of the conditions determined in the Neutrality Pact, and will support withdrawing from it unless Mordusia renounces its involvement in this war and returns to a position of full neutrality. Gwendolyn Hayforth-Breckinridge MP Member for Ulbrach RFR Foreign Affairs Spokeswoman |
| Date | 07:47:42, June 30, 2013 CET | From | Zardio Federisma Partio | To | Debating the Revoking Recognition of Mordusian Neutrality |
| Message | ooc: before you vote on it, its the 3rd Majatran War. Its been such a long break between the end of hostilities that it can be considered the 3rd one. thanks :D |
| Date | 23:01:44, June 30, 2013 CET | From | United Mordusia Coalition (IP) | To | Debating the Revoking Recognition of Mordusian Neutrality |
| Message | Right and Honorable members of this Legislature, I am here today to express my deepest sorrow for the mis-communication in the meaning of The Mordusian Neutrality Pact. SEE: http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreaty.php?treatyid=406 . The pact does not prohibit us from allocating fund to our allies. While we promise to remain neutral in all wars the meaning of the word was intended to keep us not directly involved. Yes we supplied funds and other allocations to Zardugal, this is because the war in Zardugal is one over democracy. Should Zardugal be conquered by Deltaria, they would be ruled by a Czar. We aid democracy,not Zardugal. Please, hear my cry, and let your no vote on this withdrawl represent a brighter future between our two great nations. -Chancellor Gerald Nixon |
| Date | 23:31:24, June 30, 2013 CET | From | Drania Cívica 🏴 시민당 | To | Debating the Revoking Recognition of Mordusian Neutrality |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, The Mordusian Neutrality Pact makes no explicit allowance for Mordusia to uphold a "neutral stance" whilst supplying machines of war to a nation in active conflict. The neutrality pact states that Mordusia "declares itself to be neutral in all wars and only seeks enough arms and soldiers to defend itself." And the treaty itself was established for a goal of providing " a safeguard for all people living on Mordusian soil." Military aid to a major ongoing conflict in Majatra is not neutrality, no matter what spin one may try to put on it. If Mordusia wants their terms of neutrality to include an ability to send military aid, be it weapons, tanks, naval ships, whatever, then Mordusia should consider re-writing the Mordusian Neutrality Pact. True neutrality in international relations does not involve any transfer of military aid, specifically arms and other related items (like war ships). Mordusia is not neutral. And again, if the Mordusian theory of neutrality in international relations involves an allowance of military aid, then the neutrality pact should specifically note that fact. We will stand by our decision to revoke recognition of the treaty and to uphold standard diplomatic practices. We hope that in the future Mordusia will return to its historic stance as a truly neutral state. Sun Tae-gun Minister of Foreign Affairs Republic of Dranland |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 346 | |||||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 53 |
| Random fact: Particracy has been running since 2005. Dorvik was Particracy's first nation, the Dorvik Social Democrats the first party and the International Greens the first Party Organisation. |
| Random quote: "Wherever you have an efficient government, you have a dictatorship." - Harry S. Truman |