Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5474
Next month in: 01:26:36
Server time: 02:33:23, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Peoples Commonwealth Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Federalist Republican Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 3514

Description[?]:

A bill to retire the monarchy of the Hutori state and to replace it with a truly republican institution which will more effectively represent the people.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:17:46, July 11, 2013 CET
FromRevolutionary Socialist Party
ToDebating the Peoples Commonwealth Act
MessageThe Revolutionary Socialist Party Will support all articles in this except increasing of term limits.

We understand the logic to this. But that logic is of a reactionary nature, it is trying to ensure a government can keep going despite a shift in opinions or it straying from its mandate, the current time limit will suffice. We ask Peoples Confederation remove said article for the purposes of practicality .

That is, if to say the Peoples Confederation didn't just include said article under the guise of other slightly progressive articles.

Date02:02:17, July 11, 2013 CET
FromFederalist Republican Party
ToDebating the Peoples Commonwealth Act
MessageThe FRP believes the increased term is important to secure a stable and lasting republic. We think the short 3 year term is detrimental to effective government. That said, we will remove the proposal if it will prevent passing this important reform.

Governor General Primrose

Date04:57:24, July 11, 2013 CET
FromRevolutionary Socialist Party
ToDebating the Peoples Commonwealth Act
MessageThe RSP respect the logic behind what the newly named FRP say, but this is simply not the case. The longer term limits beyond what they already are do nothing but legitimise a government that is simply run its due date, a government that may have strayed from its mandate.

The position of the RSP is that a government must at all times be answerable to its people, thusly if the peoples opinions change, the government should reflect that. The current time limits are more than enough.

However we commend the other articles and will support them.

Date04:58:50, July 11, 2013 CET
FromRevolutionary Socialist Party
ToDebating the Peoples Commonwealth Act
MessageAMENDMENT:

The RSP propose the same bill but the removal of article 5.

Date15:45:19, July 11, 2013 CET
FromFederalist Republican Party
ToDebating the Peoples Commonwealth Act
MessageSO AMENDED

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 183

no
  

Total Seats: 138

abstain
 

Total Seats: 70


Random fact: RP laws follow the same passing rules as in-game variable laws. Laws that are not of a constitutional nature require a simple majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. Laws that are of a constitutional nature require a 2/3 majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. RP laws may be abolished a simple majority vote this applies to ANY RP law.

Random quote: "A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." - Sigmund Freud

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 60