Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5472
Next month in: 01:17:37
Server time: 18:42:22, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): ShadowSneak | Tayes_Gad | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Healthcare Liberalisation Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Independence Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 3517

Description[?]:

Providing Alorians with greater choice for their healthcare

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date15:36:07, July 18, 2013 CET
FromNew Latin Party
ToDebating the Healthcare Liberalisation Act
MessageI view the idea of choice in healthcare, the same way I view the choice to live. Its either you choose to take it, or not. There is no middle ground. Its either we have on system, or we effectively have none.

Date17:48:58, July 18, 2013 CET
FromSocialist Alliance
ToDebating the Healthcare Liberalisation Act
MessageWe are unsure how this would lead to greater choice. There is a public system, there are private options. By deregulating the private system you do not lead to more choice only the possibility of health risks from substandard private care. I have never before, but after this bill passes I will make doubly sure I never set foot in a private hospital

- Joseph Fletcher

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 440

no
 

Total Seats: 0

abstain
   

Total Seats: 310


Random fact: Terra, the fictional world in which Particracy is set, consists of 8 continents: Artania, Dovani, Keris, Makon, Majatra, Seleya, Temania and Vascania.

Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia)

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 48