Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5461
Next month in: 02:47:24
Server time: 17:12:35, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Democratic Consistency Act III

Details

Submitted by[?]: Democratic Centre Party of Gaduridos

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2051

Description[?]:

In a democratic society, it is imperative that all parties be able to negotiate freely in attempting to form a cabinet. The power to propose cabinets ought not rest solely in the hands of the Philosopher.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:05:32, May 12, 2005 CET
FromBenevolent Totalitarian Party - FLF
ToDebating the Democratic Consistency Act III
MessageAs the party who proposed the first two Democratic Consistency Acts, we fully support this initiative.

Date00:05:54, May 12, 2005 CET
FromDemocratic Centre Party of Gaduridos
ToDebating the Democratic Consistency Act III
MessageThe BTP has tried to pass this proposal twice before, and allegedly democratic parties opposed it, thinking of their own self-interest before the principles of democracy. We hope those parties will see the error of their way, and vote for this bill now.

Date00:06:08, May 12, 2005 CET
FromDemocratic Centre Party of Gaduridos
ToDebating the Democratic Consistency Act III
MessageMoving immediately to vote.

Date02:38:44, May 12, 2005 CET
FromNational Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Democratic Consistency Act III
MessageAGREE

Date06:30:53, May 12, 2005 CET
FromPeople's Progressive Party
ToDebating the Democratic Consistency Act III
MessageDisagree again as our party does believe some power like forming a cabinet should rest with the executive to balance out a powerful legislature.

Date11:29:31, May 12, 2005 CET
FromSocial Democrat Party
ToDebating the Democratic Consistency Act III
MessageI agree with the PPP. I shall not be a hypocrite and change my vote now that I am not in power.

Date12:44:48, May 12, 2005 CET
FromNational Democratic Party
ToDebating the Democratic Consistency Act III
Messagethe NDP will abstain yet again...

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 34

no
   

Total Seats: 76

abstain
 

Total Seats: 17


Random fact: Real-life places should not be referenced in Particracy.

Random quote: "I think the environment should be put in the category of our national security. Defense of our resources is just as important as defense abroad. Otherwise, what is there to defend?" - Robert Redford

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 73