Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5471
Next month in: 03:19:57
Server time: 12:40:02, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): burgerboys | LC73DunMHP | Xalvas | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ending Historic Diplomatic Relations with Zardugal

Details

Submitted by[?]: Imperial Conservative Union (IA)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 3520

Description[?]:

With the betrayal of the Federation of Zardugal's government in being one of the few nations to pass and recognize the false rebel republic in Alduria over the rightful and just claim of the Aldurian Imperial Government in Exile, we have no choice but to end all diplomatic relations with Zardugal. A nation at one point could be called Luthori's greatest ally and friend.

http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=386034

With the passage of this Act all relations with the Federation of Zardugal shall be suspended until further notice. This Act can be automatically revoked if Zardugal removes themselves from the treaty.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date05:53:37, July 23, 2013 CET
FromZardio Federisma Partio
ToDebating the Ending Historic Diplomatic Relations with Zardugal
MessageMr Speaker,
May the Zardic embassy address this bill?

Charges D'Affaires Joan Rivertun

Date06:17:34, July 23, 2013 CET
FromImperial Conservative Union (IA)
ToDebating the Ending Historic Diplomatic Relations with Zardugal
MessageSpeaker: Imperial Seal-Bearer, His Grace, Albert Noventa, 39th Grand Duke of Tinako

All comments may be addressed to the Ministry who, shall then bring them forward if the ministry believes that the points are of merit and pertain to the debate on this matter.

Date20:05:11, July 23, 2013 CET
FromImperial Conservative Union (IA)
ToDebating the Ending Historic Diplomatic Relations with Zardugal
MessageMr. Speaker,

It has come to our attention that the Zardugal government is in the process of moving to reject the treaty that they have passed. As such we will continue on course to reject this treaty and will then re-approve it if they reverse course.

I yield.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 305

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
      

    Total Seats: 344


    Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

    Random quote: "When I was a boy I was told that anybody could become President; I'm beginning to believe it." - Clarence Darrow

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 44